Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:I laid out the facts, horse will not drink (Score 1, Funny) 102

You haven't laid out anything other than a bunch of baseless accusations. You should write a book about it, I'm sure it'll sell.

Bwaahahaha!

"I didn't do it. Nobody saw me do it. You can't prove anything"

It's the Bart Simpson defense!

[Beetlejuice voice] And it just keeps getting funnier *every* *single* *time* I see it! [/Beetlejuice voice]

How about you just stick your fingers in your ears and go; "Lalalala, I can't hear you! Lalalala!".

Too funny!

Strat

Comment Re:Stupid reasoning. (Score 1) 1094

Are the moderators out of their minds today? Some awfully silly comments are getting modded up in this story.

The reason that you don't make minimum wage $100 an hour is because the objective is not to close businesses, but instead to just give employees a chance to survive on a basic level out from their full-time wages. Government (as an expression of larger society) does well to ensure that business owners don't get rich by making their employees poor and by making them have to go on government assistance. $15 an hour is a good and reasonable minimum wage for an area with such a high cost of living.

Comment Re:My god you people need to think about economics (Score 1) 1094

The Waltons wealth did not come from their employees payroll. The Waltons wealth is in shares of the company. The company is worth a lot of money and because the Waltons own a lot of the company that makes them very wealthy.

Um, what? Of course the money that they don't pay their employees is a large part of their wealth. Every dollar that they don't pay their employees is a dollar that goes into their pockets, in the form of profit/loss and stock valuation. Oh, it's also a dollar that comes out of taxpayers' pockets too, in the form of food stamps, medicaid, welfare, etc. In other words, taxpayers are partially subsidizing the Waltons' (and many other business owners and stockholders) wealth.

Transportation

Oregon Testing Pay-Per-Mile Driving Fee To Replace Gas Tax 837

schwit1 tips news that Oregon will become the first U.S. state to test a program to replace their gas tax with a fee for each mile citizens drive on public roads. The 5,000 people voluntarily participating in the test will be charged 1.5 cents per mile. Revenue from gas tax has been on the decline as vehicles get more fuel efficient and as hybrids and electric cars become more popular. This measure is an attempt to raise the amount of money the state takes in to pay for infrastructure projects. Many owners of those hybrid and electric vehicles are upset, saying it specifically targets them and discourages environmentally-friendly transportation. Others point out that those who drive electric vehicles need the roads maintained just as much as people still driving gas-powered cars.
Power

Energy Dept. Wants Big Wind Energy Technology In All 50 US States 256

coondoggie writes: Bigger wind turbines and towers are just part of what the U.S. needs in order to more effectively use wind energy in all 50 states.That was the thrust of a wind energy call-to-arms report called "Enabling Wind Power nationwide" issued this week by the Department of Energy. They detail new technology that can reach higher into the sky to capture more energy and more powerful turbines to generate more gigawatts. These new turbines are 110-140 meters tall, with blades 60 meters long. The Energy Department forecasts strong, steady growth of wind power across the country, both on land and off shore.

Comment How About... (Score 2) 17

...We first teach them basic reading, writing, math, history, and critical-thinking/problem-solving skills that are sorely lacking among HS grads?

Oh wait, can't have that! The little bastards might figure out how screwed they are by the crony-capitalist fascist oligarchy and actually be able to change the status-quot!

Strat

Businesses

Battle To Regulate Ridesharing Moves Through States 328

New submitter jeffengel writes: The push to regulate services like Uber and Lyft has spread through state legislatures nationwide. At least 15 states have passed ridesharing laws in 2015, joining Colorado, California, and Illinois from last year. More could follow, with bills pending in Massachusetts, Michigan, North Carolina, and others. All this activity has led to new clashes with companies, city leaders, and consumers. Ridesharing bills have stalled or been killed off in Texas, Florida, New Mexico, and Mississippi. Meanwhile, Uber has exited Kansas and is threatening to leave New Jersey and Oregon, while Lyft has ceased operations in Houston, Columbus, and Tacoma. How this plays out could affect the companies' expansion plans, as well as the future of transportation systems worldwide.

Comment Re:The UK, trying to beat China, NK at their own g (Score 3, Insightful) 118

Really?? Are you that stupid that you think the only way to change government is via violent revolution?

Not at all. The four boxes (soap, ballot, jury, ammo) are to be used in that order. So far we've tried soap, ballot, and jury.

Next, I would try peaceful non-compliance, but I'm not naive enough to believe that the government would not respond violently.

I think people like you are dangerous to any thriving society and downright deadly to any less than thriving society.

We do not live in a "thriving society", we live in a fascist oligarchy that is descending into collapse. You are delusional if you believe otherwise.

You will attract other idiots and eventually get them killed while justifying the jackboot tactics the government would use in response.

So, with heavily-armed domestic paramilitary units assaulting the homes of citizens for things like student loan debts and misdemeanors, just how much farther does the government need to go before you would justify self defense? After you've been rounded up and sent to a camp is a bit late.

Some twit in office will look at your writings and you will convince them that spying on citizens is just and reasonable.

News flash, Bunky. They have believed that for decades.

Let's just hope they think you are little more than a retarded monkey that doesn't need to get on the list.

Nice ad hominem. Down to the last resort of those who cannot defend their position, eh? Let's hope they don't believe that everyone will roll over and lick their boots as you seem adamant to do, as that guarantees they will proceed at full speed.

You will justify this by your own words.

Yeah just sit down, shut up, and comply, right? Attitudes like that are historically what have enabled tyranny to fester.

Let me translate it into a language you'll comprehend;

"Baa-aaa-aaahhhh!"

Strat

Comment Re:Why Do We Carry On Pretending? (Score 1) 118

So let's be glad that the army we have ain't one where only people who really, really believe in the shit can join... oh wait.

Yes their indoctrination machine is infallible, that's why gangs in the US send gang members to join the US military for training, and why so many militia members are ex-military.

Wow, they don't need to send a jackbooted thug for you, do they? You're already in a gulag of your own making.

Strat

Comment Re:The UK, trying to beat China, NK at their own g (Score 2) 118

Won't happen in the US ever. Won't happen in the UK either. What might happen is an English version of Tiananmen square. Both governments will see it happening before it happens and it will be put down quickly. Thinking otherwise is little more than an invitation to be put down sooner than later.

Yes, abandon all hope.If we lick their boots convincingly, maybe we'll be the last into the gulag.

Strat

Comment Re:Why Do We Carry On Pretending? (Score 2) 118

What army should we use to go up against their armies?

That very same military.

They are not all unquestioning robots. Many will desert and go over to the civilian's side, and take their training and all the equipment/resources/weapons they can manage with them, while destroying what they cannot take/use.

Strat

Comment Re: Markets, not people (Score 0) 615

It's unclear from your post which you feel is worst, socialism or violence. Can't have ordinary people working together for the common good, now can we?

They are not mutually exclusive, and in most cases Socialism and violence go hand-in-hand. Socialism has never worked except in relatively small, homogenous cultures. In larger and more diverse cultures Socialism has always devolved into some form of communism or fascism with corruption, violence, and death aplenty, typically with extreme poverty for all but the 'connected' and powerful.

Strat

Slashdot Top Deals

Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer

Working...