Because the only one that has a response responsibility is me. The mistake was ever to consider this dialogue.

Well, let's keep in mind that you're the one asking the questions here. Far be it from you to sound anything other than Oz-like.

Oh, and you "know" all of the politics and legalities and intrigues. As though it wasn't ALL charades, from end to end, subsequent to the departure from common sense. Which was my point, after all.

If "illegal" means "likely to result in court action that actually sticks" let's just stipulate that the Obama Administration is just a sea of tea & crumpets.
Having rejected the idea of truth, the rule of law is just a line of coke we seem to snort together.

You understand that there are side deals with the IAEA? Watch the Senator Cotton video at the link. The whole situation is utterly indefensible. We could have just had the Red Hot Chili Peppers go to negotiations and play a concert and had more for our money. Our foreign policy seems to be: "Yeah, we got nothin'."

I believe the polls exist. I also believe that if you don't have access to the questions, methodology, and funding source, you're the sound of one hand with the clap.

It's not being handled as a proper treaty. In defense of President Obama, he's not alone in betrayal.

All roads lead to Woodrow.

Which is why #OccupyResoluteDesk is not calling it a treaty. Because his administration is a fundamentally un-conservative attack on all that is proper about our notion of self-government.

Note, too: you completely ignored my procedural point. Another "conspiracy" cop-out. *sigh*

Because the Iranians have always been so honest and stuff.
Note, too: you completely ignored my procedural point.

I mean, I stipulated in the JE that I doubt I'll actually see it. Why would I pay someone to waste ~2hrs of my life?

Oh, I already have, baby.

"'A liar AND a thief'? There may be an uncertainty principle at work here," said Heisenberg.

We really have to put some newspaper under you, for moments when you overflow like this. To drop the current egregious example, the Iran deal Congressional shortcutting, and taking the sell-out straight to the Untied Nations is not even "kinda" conservative. In a rational time (and this sure as balls ain't) this particular stunt would be more impeachy than simply peachy.

You've got to understand: it's unlikely I'll watch this. The real pleasure is watching the usual suspects melt down.