Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:When you ride at night, (Score 4, Interesting) 413

Or he was drunk. Or high. Or had a suspended license. Or a warrant. Or was an "undocumented worker". Or any number of things that would lead the guy to flee the scene, even if he wasn't the at fault party. I mean, my experience tells me that the driver likely was at fault, but we really don't know, and there can be a ton a reasons why someone would take off.

Comment Re:Shred of dignity (Score 3, Informative) 194

Well, there were at least 6 ships named "Enterprise" in the US Navy, and the likelihood is that when Roddenberry was choosing the a name for his fictional vessel, he named it after either the WW2 Carrier (which was the most decorated warship in US history) or the newer Enterprise which was the US's first nuclear powered carrier. So pretty much, the shuttle was named after a US Navy ship, albeit indirectly.

Comment Re:Texas leads the way, again (Score 1) 262

And yet it ranks in the top 20. Then you have a state like California that spends way more money, yet comes in in the bottom 20. And having gone to high school in Texas in a very conservative and extremely religious town, I never saw anything at all regarding creationism in biology class. Although not a whole hell of alot of evolution either. On the other hand, I did get handed chick tracts more than once from fellow students regarding evolution, which I did appreciate for the comedic value. However, while attending grad school in biology at a university in California, I came to the realization that most California students had an extremely poor understanding of evolution. Point being, evolution is covered so poorly, even in strongly secular, left wing places like California, that complaining about the effect that religious nuts have on it in conservative areas is pretty much pointless.

Comment Re:I can't wait (Score 1) 95

But bigger point: either don't fear biotech advances, or at least be equal

But they're not equal. Dystopian futures involving computers promise a future where we're ruled over by machines - which, might be more capable than we are. There is an element of coolness to robotic/computer overlords.

Biotech dystopian futures, on the other hand, promise a future where we're ruled over by humans who think they're more capable than we are (but probably aren't)....just like now. And there's nothing cool about being ruled over by a human...just like now.

Or perhaps, a utopian future where the amoral sociopaths aren't allowed to hold public office?

Slashdot Top Deals

Real Programmers don't eat quiche. They eat Twinkies and Szechwan food.

Working...