A tall person is over 6 foot. that has a nice ring to it. 1.8 metres is not human friendly. A foot is about the size of an adult foot, it makes sense.
1.8 Metres is just as user friendly as foot when you're brought up in it.
How about we create a metric friendly unit for human measurement called fut.
1 fut = 30 cm
1 fut = 10 dinches
1 dinch = 3 cm
So, instead of a height of imperial 5"8' or a non-intuitive 172cm, we get a more intuitive 5.7 futs.
When Australia converted to metric, the building industry very intelligently decided that mm is to be used exclusively and cm are not allowed.
So, the specs would say the height of a 5-story building is 18,000 mm instead of 180m ?
Exactly, so if we changed the school curriculum to teach business courses (including sales and marketing) at an early age, there would be competition to companies like microsoft. This would lead to more businesses being created. With more businesses around, there would be intense competition for qualified or even average workers and employee wages would have to rise.
Right now, business is taught at a very late age to students -- near or above the age of 20 and is often prohibitively expensive. In other words, most people are taught to be employees. People with an aptitude for business should be taught early in the same way math is taught at an early age.
I ask in ignorance, why would I design the GUI in obj-C when I have X-tools/interface builder to do all that for me? I just connect the dots, right?
Interface Builder generates a bunch of boilerplate obj-c code for you. But anytime you need to add your own references etc or do anything other than simple stuff, you have modify that code. It's not as easy to use as C#, VB or Delphi because it exposes all the plumbing of the GUI.
Have you actually used objc? It involves writing tons of boilerplate code for the GUI (compared to MS
There's no reason to use a language more difficult than Java/Python unless you really need the performance.
In retaliation, we the people should demand that the government ditch all Microsoft products and go open source!
And how does that solve the problem? Since open source does not pay its developers (in most cases), developers don't get paid whether MS outsources or if open source products are used.
So it's telling us just what we already knew? Interesting.
Really? I didn't know until now that Ruby was slightly faster than Java or that Python is only slightly slower than C#. This is referring to the graph in the "Which programming languages have the best runtime performance?" Crap study.
This is at least a $100m loss, likely closer to $200m-$250m
I was so wrong thinking a game like this requires only 50 developers. Here's what they spent/used for WoW:
Austin GDC 2009: Frank Pearce explains what it takes to craft 7,650 quests, 70,000 spells, 40,000 NPCs, 1.5 million assets, and 5.5 million lines of code; some 4,000 employees, 13,250 server blades, and 75,000 CPU cores keep MMORPG running.
Can they really afford to write off the couple-million-and-change Titan undoubtedly cost to make?
It's probably near the $20-40 million range for seven years rather than $2 million. But that's okay since they make well over $100 million per year just from world of warcraft.
According to a post in this thread, some negative comments were deleted by pubpeer mods. The image evidence does seem pretty damning, even to someone who knows nothing about cancer research.
I'm also not sure how research papers are actually authored, especially so many by one person. Couldn't it be someone else did the actual research, perhaps grad or PhD students and he just mentored them, gave them advice and edited a few things which gave him the right to put his name on the papers? In which case, I guess claiming credit for others' work bit him in the ass.
Anyone can make an omelet with eggs. The trick is to make one with none.