Comment Even though.... (Score 2) 1193
"DON'T BE EVIL"
Like every other monolithic company in the world.
First, lets clear up some terms: My PC is a computer. My MAC is a computer. The iPhone is and appliance. The iPad is an appliance. If you don't know the difference, do some research.
What is Apple's main business model on the iPhone, iPad, iPod? To market 3rd party software through their system and make money. If I was allowed to write Flash applications that ran in the browser on these platforms, then no one would have to rush out to Apple's iTunes store to buy anything for these appliances.
And you think that Steve will fully embrace HTML5? No way. iTunes would be dead if HTML5 was fully functional on any of Apple's products. You could write the same applications that would run in the browser and completely defeat the native apps that Apple sells.
"NPR reports that with snow blanketing much of the country, the topic of global warming has become the butt of jokes; but for scientists who study the climate, there's no contradiction between a warming world and lots of snow."
The above statement is wrong. The IPCC's latest report said exactly the opposite of this statement. The computer models showed a global decrease in precipitation due to the warming of the earth's atmosphere, not an increase. An increase in global humidity would cause increased cloud cover at lower altitudes, which has been proven years ago causes a decrease in surface temperature due to the refection effect.
I read the report. If you take the IPCC to be the default standard for climate change, then you have to believe that there has not been an increase in snow coverage. The white stuff you see coming down outside is actually just common "Albino Brain Chiggers". They are harmless. Put some tin foil on your head and they will stay out of your ears. Also, they are caused by global warming.
Nothing to see here.
I owned a small self-publishing company for 3 years and sold it. When I started the company I made a firm decision that the company would NOT obtain or transfer copyright ownership from anyone we published for. I knew there were a few publishers that we competed against that had "questionable" contracts that appeared to transfer copyright ownership and/or enforcement from the creator of the work. I thought that by using a more honorable business model we could attract writers and offer another method to get works distributed.
Oh, wow, let me tell you how this industry is...
My company started almost from day one to be hit with a series of slanders and false statements from a number of "anonomous" sources. I was put through the grinder, but did manage to build a good reputation with the people we published and distributed for. I talked to a lot of other people who used various other companies, and got the chance to see some of the contracts that the competition used. I can tell you that most, if not all, either outright transferred the majority of ownership from the original creator or had terms that were so vague that it would take a team of lawyers to figure it out.
My biggest wakeup call was when we had to stop printing a series of art books because the artist signed a contract with another company, not for the works WE printed, but for another totally unrelated work. He didn't see the little part of the contract which gave the company he signed up with TOTAL rights to ALL his works, even those that they had never printed or were never planning to print, created since the day he was born. WOW!
When you control the distribution of a product, you can write your own terms to those who need their product sold. It's as simple as that. For years the publishing companies controlled all the methods to get books into the stores, and it continues to this day. Writers often find that they have to either sign on the dotted line or simply forget about ever having their works seen by the public. I also discovered that a lot of writers and creators had no idea that they had signed away their rights until I pointed out the terms in their contracts.
I once thought that companies such as Amazon could change the landscape for the independant writer/creator. But what I have been noticing is that even with Amazon most people are "locked" in to some sort of system that simply will not let go. A year or so ago I think that even Amazon tried (and may have succeded) into having all works printed through their own company, thereby eliminating small printing companies out of the loop. It's interesting to see that even Amazon must bend to the will of another company when it comes to distribution pricing.
And lets not even begin to think about what Google's book scanning system is doing to the copyright landscape. "Do no evil"? Bite me on that one.
I am glad to be out of the publishing business, and feel greatly sorry for the future generations that will have content locked, forced upon them, distributed through systems they have to participate in, and prices dictated not my market forces but by lack of competition.
Nuff said.
Eric Freyhart
The use of money is all the advantage there is to having money. -- B. Franklin