Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Not facebook? (Score 1) 243

Apple isn't going to do it because they want to control everything.

When a company's actions lack any financial motive, chances are they're doing it out of principle. When Apple exercises control over something (like a closed iPhone App Store), it has a financial motive. Refusal to sell personal information has no financial motive.

Comment Re:Not interested (Score 1) 83

Sort of yes, sort of no. Some people live in rural or semi-rural areas where they have crappy ISPs. That means you can't play SC2 any way you like, any time you like. Much of this game requires a constant internet connection, especially since (and I learned this the hard way) it's prone to random deletion of your locally cached maps for no apparent reason (forcing you to redownload everything).

If you don't have an Internet connection to Blizzard's servers, you can't play maps you've created, even when they're already right on your hard drive.

Comment Re:Um, No (Score 1) 104

Yeah, because one typing error on an uneditable web forum is an indicator eh? Makes total sense.

My point still stands. Much of what's on ArXiv is crap. I've seen too many jackoffs claim that they've proven/disproven the Riemann hypothesis, and they go to ArXiv because it's the only place that doesn't tear their paper apart.

Comment Re:First post! (Score 4, Interesting) 520

Halo originally wasn't ever intended to be an XBox game. Back in those days, Bungie was a Mac-only game company.

Then Bungie publicly showed a demo of an early alpha version in action. M$ saw it and decided they wanted to have it as an exclusive for the new console they were developing.

To Mac users it was like Halo was stolen before it even left the womb.

Comment Re:This looks like a typical straw man argument. (Score 1) 476

Some theories posit that trichromatic vision is a genetic mutation where the M cone gene was copied and mutated to result in a slight shift. If it were a truly independent adaptation, you might expect it to be much further away

Why would genetic mutations be distinct or exclusive from "truly independent adaptation? I'm guess I fail to see the distinction, since aren't all adaptations genetic mutations?

Also, since I'm unfamiliar with any evolutionary debates regarding the biological evolution of color sensors, have any biologists hypothesized that perhaps the mutation stuck simply because it may have served as a useful redundancy against the occasional occurrence of a certain type of color-blindness? (just making an uneducated guess there).

Slashdot Top Deals

One man's constant is another man's variable. -- A.J. Perlis

Working...