"imprecise" meaning completely misconstruing things in a way to imply an outright untrue thing.
"Not a gamer" and "not playing one specific genre" are so far separate as far as concepts go, that I can't imagine a scenario where it could even theoretically be considered a relevant criticism.
I'm now going to knee jerk you as a shithead whose willing to see past some serious levels of dishonesty when it justifies your own opinions.
1. No, it's not, given that rather extraordinary evidence that people have harassed and threatened her already.
2. No, how can it possibly be sexism to attack obviously sexist people of unknown gender for posting obviously stupid shit
3. Still no.
4. And yet... you trust that these ACs are acting in good faith. Nope, sorry, your own proven history with being a tremendous hypocrite to me personally raises my suspicions that you're being tremendously intellectually dishonest here.
Yes, people seriously believe that.
It's sad, but the complete lameness of those people isn't a reason for disbelief.
Yes, those expectations are formally structured and called "laws".
Oh yeah, sure, that's relevant to credible death threats.
She's just "being offended" that someone might kill her.
Christ this isn't a "PC police" problem this is "police" problem.
If you're just talking about her videos in general, I'm sorry that you don't like what other people paid to make. But if opinions shut down things that bothered you and other people liked, you'd better be prepared to video games to go out the window for the same reason.
Oh, so because you're justifying the fact that GP is a damn liar, you're assuming I'm going to knee jerk at you?
That's a really weird attitude.
Eh, I'm usually a pacifist when it comes to all the pointless conflicts the US gets involved in, but unopposed military hegemony ruthlessly expanding has a
Oh no. A technology exists.
Let me rephrase that. I cannot comprehend your objections.
Yes, but now that's something that's executively enforceable. The cops CAN come knock down your door over it, and the state use of force would be justified.
Our whole legal system is a giant fence that's designed to protect you from someone bigger, more numerous, and better armed from messing with you, until we're good and sure that it's better off that someone did.
Where "expect" means failing to do so merits punishment for failing a socially necessary moral standard.
Not that it won't happen. But that it's a level of decency people should be compelled to meet.
Sorry for the ambiguity in phrasing.
Yeah, as far as windows Store goes, things went from empty to spamfilled with no golden era of sorta useful in between.
I'm not defending the quality of her reviews, but some points are both relevant and good.
But near as I can tell the "no interest in games thing" doesn't have any source besides being mindlessly repeated by people who hate her. I'm going to guess you saw someone say that and assumed it was true.
Godwin's law is fine. Go ahead. Claim you win because you made a lazy argument ad populum.
No, my worldview really does allow for a little flexibility when stakes are extremely high.
Let's just all agree that Sarkeesian is not Hitler. She posted videos with opinions.
Yeah, and thus we throw those who go too far in jail. This is kinda how living in a society works. There are limits.
For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!
