Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Traffic signals (Score 1) 71

I'm fairly sure that here in the UK traffic lights are just on a set timing sequence.

Is it different in the US because you have a lot more infrequently used roads that require manual triggering?
That rather prompts the question of why you bother having lights at all at junctions where traffic is so infrequent.

Comment Re:Where is the seat of consciousness? (Score 1) 114

A very fundamental question that no one has answered yet and few people even ask is this: does the brain produce consciousness/mind/spirit or is it the other way around?

This is not an interesting question. You are essentially asking if the universe is based on physics or mysticism. Idealism is absurd, Dualism leads to unanswerable questions and Materialism seems to be working out pretty well for us.

It's not quite as black and white as you make out. You don't have to believe in "mysticism" or "idealism" to know that consciousness exists. Cogito ergo sum still seems true to me.

Cartesian dualism might produce unhelpful consequences , but you can't handwave it away simply by saying there's no such thing as mind or consciousness.

If consciousness can't be explained by pure materialism, then pure materialism is an incomplete theory.

There doesn't have to be a magical explanation for something that we don't (yet) understand, but that doesn't mean we can simply write it off as imaginary.

This isn't like talking about the existence of gods or an immortal soul. I have no direct evidence for them, whereas I do for my self.

Comment Re:putting on my flame retardant suit... (Score 1) 114

The arrogance of science is astounding in regard to the certainty of the conclusions. The current so-called scientists that are insulted at even the suggestion that there is still a debate are laughable.

Ah yes, the ever-popular "but evolution's only a theory" argument used by pro-Creationists with no understanding of the scientific method.

Comment Re:So much for human brain simulations (Score 1) 114

This just illustrates how ridiculous the current efforts to simulate a human brain in computers really are. Ancient humans would have stood a better chance of simulating a 747 had they put their minds to it. As far as the brain is concerned, we are still probably at a stage at which we do yet know the extent of our ignorance.

But, hey ho, we're still going to have Artificial Intelligence/the Singularity in the next twenty years, with perfect emulation of the brain, a virtual reality universe indistinguishable from the real one, and immortality. Ray Kurzweil says so.

Comment Re:Meet Streisand (Score 1) 307

I agree. The other thing, though, is that IT'S A CONTRACT. Read, read read! I don't know why people who don't read the contract try to get out of it later. I know it's not kosher to put things like this in the contact, but contracts are like that. They're usually one sided in favor of one party or another. The question is, whether this was illegal (extorting money for negative reviews). If it wasn't, then I don't see how one should be able to get out of it.

This was a simple retail transaction, not a commercial negotiation.

Luckily, I doubt that this hotel will be seeing many of the latter until they come to talk to their liquidators.

Comment Re:It's a combination of problems (Score 1) 154

well I am 6"6' and have done fencing for half my life as well as kick boxing, and yes I would happily remove your technology from you should you decide to use the highly invasion google glass around me.

Hint for internet tough guys: don't boast about your fencing skills unless you habitually wear a sword.

Slashdot Top Deals

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?

Working...