pretty much nailed it, too bad you replied AC

on purpose or not, it's always funny to scold others for being knuckleheads only to spell 'moron' incorrectly

good comment, however

In the spirit of helping out, I'm willing to beta-test the delivery system for free.

Please.

Fingerprints are only good for identification.

DNA carries much more information about a person. As technologies improve in the genetics industry and with human ingenuity for dastardly deeds, it's not hard to conceive of how this information could be abused.

Once you're in the system, there's usually no way out. Be very cautious about things with things that can't be undone.

Who is making money from this?

link please

Thanks for reviving that stupid riff in my head for the next few days

jerk

Having never seen a touch screen-based note-taking app being used, I was thinking the same thing. Having to write while your hand floats above the surface doesn't seem to be very natural nor comfortable.

Any insights? Not worth the googling effort at this point.

Well said; you nailed it. Wish I had mod points for you.

You misspelled misspell.

If I had to guess as to why use coffee beans as fuel, I understand that when roasted, they are actually subjected to a process called torrefaction. In this way, moisture and other undesirable compounds in the raw biomass are boiled off. What remains has a Btu content just under that of coal, burns more consistently, and is resistant to moisture. Even if the coffee was first used to make the tasty beverage, I'm sure the used grounds would still have plenty of use as a gasification fuel.

The costs of processing the 'fuel' is actually paid for by the first use of coffee: drinking. To get a ready-to-use gasification fuel as a by-product sounds like a great way to extend its uses.

p.s., sorry, I think I duped this reply

If I had to guess as to why use coffee beans as fuel, I understand that when roasted, they are actually subjected to a process called torrefaction. In this way, moisture and other undesirable compounds in the raw biomass are boiled off. What remains has a Btu content just under that of coal, burns more consistently, and is resistant to moisture. Even if the coffee was first used to make the tasty beverage, I'm sure the used grounds would still have plenty of use as a gasification fuel.

The costs of processing the 'fuel' is actually paid for by the first use of coffee: drinking. To get a ready-to-use gasification fuel as a by-product sounds like a great way to extend its uses.

How does this guy post such a well thought out, cogent rebuttal -- with good grammar and spelling -- and done quickly enough to get first post?

He must have an app for that.