Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Why do I care? (Score 0, Troll) 297

I must be missing something about this... I mean, when I was in an airport overseas, and they started to go through my check luggage as part of standard security, my knee-jerk reaction at first was to be a bit freaked. But after 30 seconds of thought I realized that this was GOOD. They were HAND SEARCHING luggage! Plus scanning it. No bombs on that plane! So why do people care about scanners? Is it some kind of weird prudish thing? Or do the scanners do some harm? I'm happy to fly nude. I'll know the chance of someone having a weapon is pretty small!

Comment Re:Really? (Score 1) 897

Have you _seen_ what a unionized heavy equipment operator gets?

I don't understand... What's the difference between the heavy equipment operators with free electrons, and those without?

Comment Re:FIRST!!!! well almost (Score 1) 596

Yes! Finally! Someone gets it! The power users are going to want their own stuff, and they're picky about it. It's hard to make a mouse that all power users will like. Look at Logitech and Microsoft's offerings! And don't even start on gaming mice. It's easy, however, to design a basic mouse that a hamster can learn to use. Apple Puck notwithstanding. :-)

Comment Re:FIRST!!!! well almost (Score 2, Interesting) 596

I'm soooo tired of the multi-versus-one-button mouse debate. Apple debuted the very first commercial, widely available mouse. They chose to have one button over however many the original Xerox PARC mouse had for a very good reason. Getting people to reach out and move a mouse and push a button was a HUGE paradigm shift. If you weren't there and don't remember this era, you don't get an opinion, BTW. :-) Anyway, it was an extremely valid design choice for the first macs. It does seem that Apple stuck to this for WAY too long, refusing to even offer a multi-button option of their own. But, there is something to be said for the design from the point of view of first-time users, even into the 90s. Remember, a lot of people were buying their FIRST computer in these decades. Ok, so, now apple ships multi-button mice. And I will STILL replace them with 8-button logitech devices. But my grandmother won't. Lowest common denominator, people. Now, if Apple would just give me a multitouch pad for my computer.... Can we please never speak of Apple and one-button mice again? Please? You must be at least 35 years old to have an opinion on this subject.

Submission + - I need a new wristwatch: help me!

markian writes: People have recently posted about heart rate monitors and open access to exercise data. I have a different problem, one from which I instinctively shy as I know from past experience that it will cause me great pain and suffering: I need a new watch!

I currently own a Nike Oregon Adventure. This replaced my previous Timex Expedition, and my well-loved Casio G-Force. The Nike and the Casio are the only watches that have ever stood up to the abuse I have given them. (To be fair, Timex's strap was the weak point, the watch was fine.) I love the Nike, but it now needs a repair (one button has stopped working, and possibly the strap is going). So I'm considering something new. Problem is, I know what I need, but there seems to be no useful mechanism for finding it without spending weeks pouring over reviews. How do you all deal with this? Here is my wishlist:

-ultra-rugged, but not foolishly bulky. Nike was better than Casio for bulk, but both were practically indestructible

-Several LOUD alarms. Nike has 4 + 2 alt + hydration.

-100m water proof.

-Compass, barometer, altimeter, thermometer, are all great ["essential"] features. (ie, I don't need all of them all of the time, but I need some of them most of the time.)

-Count down timer MUST have a minimum resolution of no more than 1 second, and preferably allow several intervals. Casio had a better alarm option for longer intervals, but Nike won hands down for ease of use and 5 intervals. I once returned a casio upon discovering that the minimum resolution was 1 minute! I do some exercise sets in less than a minute, so this is essential.

-Chronograph must store lap information and give me run details on my wrist. Nike blew me away. It stored up to 50 laps, and each 'run' gave me:
          -average lap
          -best lap
          -time for each lap
          -total time
  plus, during the run I was able to easily toggle between total and lap time.It would have been REALLY great if I'd been able to sync this with a computer, by which I mean not Windows. Only Unix-based OSes need apply.

-Good light (ie electroluminescent)

-Easily [user!] replaceable battery.

So, given my criteria, how do I go about finding a watch that matches this? I find that promotional materials and even reviews often leave out details that are important to me. I don't live in a large enough urban centre that I can just go and look (like New York!). And some things like alarm volume are subjective.

How do slashdotters approach this? Can someone recommend my perfect watch? For under $500? :-D

Slashdot Top Deals

For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!

Working...