Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment RLC's *are* money-making schemes! (Score 2, Informative) 348

Another thing that should be banned is one- or two-second yellow lights. At every intersection in my area (Chesterfield County, VA) where they've shortened the duration of a yellow light, accidents have spiked dramatically. The original reason for the implementation of such was so that more tickets could be written, but as usual, the PHB's in the county offices didn't acknowledge that costs for police, ambulances and fire-engines to respond to an accident scene would outweigh any additional revenue.

Comment Change-logs are strictly for internal use! (Score 1) 162

Change-logs should be strictly for internal use! 1) Log entries will contain technical shorthand that is meaningless to novices. 2) Opening these logs up exposes the company to all kinds of liability. 3) Do you think most people want to wade through mostly trivial and redundant entries? The proper forum to introduce meaningful new features to the public is in a blog. It goes without saying that this blog should be actively maintained and have at least one person whose sole job is maintaining it and filtering information from the technical teams, packaging it for public consumption.

Comment Re:The Fine was $12 M, but, (Score 1) 192

Even worse, Knight will probably file an insurance claim, and then write off any deductible and premium hikes as a cost of doing business. Oh yeah, and pass those on as increased costs to any customers or clients. Nothing like double-dipping in case like this. I mean we can't pass by a golden opportunity to bugger tax-payers and clients, can we?

Comment Re:Still Bad Patents (Score 1) 162

Mod parent up.

This is why I favour X Prizes to solve various challenges as opposed to an expanded patent regime. X Prizes also solve the pesky problem of some government bureaucrat picking someone s/he thinks will be a winner. When people say they disapprove of government subsidies because it promotes government picking winners, they're not completely accurate. When government picks the 'how' and 'who' of solving a problem rather than the 'what' (i.e., desired outcome), it's merely picking the party it believes will come out on top, based mostly on cronyism, must less so on some much-vaunted and usually exaggerated 'breakthrough' that is merely promising rather than actually solving the problem. With X Prizes, at least, the money can't be claimed until some party comes forward with a demonstrable (not merely claimed or promised) solution to said problem.

Comment Re:Who's surprised? (Score 1) 310

US intelligence failures that led to the Iraq war which must surely lead one to lower the competence rating of the US intelligence services still further.

We must consider the distinct possibility that shoes-on-the-ground CIA operators and their handlers and analysts told Cheney through appropriate channels that there was no evidence of WMD's, but he didn't like that answer because he had vested interests in reality being the opposite -- so after the fact he could claim, 'Shucks, I guess there weren't any WMD's after all, but the doggone CIA fed me rubbish intelligence so blame them for getting us into that kerfuffle.' He had already made his money through the bombing and subsequent occupation and rebuilding, so he didn't give two shits about throwing the entire intelligence community under the bus.

I'm not saying that the CIA and other US intelligence bodies aren't completely rotten at the top, but when the (mostly) hard-working and honest people lower down in the hierarchy get blamed whole-cloth for policy failures, let's all take a step back and see whose agenda is most suspect.

Slashdot Top Deals

Anyone can make an omelet with eggs. The trick is to make one with none.

Working...