So I guess you're also against HUDs like I had in my last two cars.
Have you seen what distractions cops drive around with?!?
Seems to me the only idiot here is you!
You're in a deep load of shit if the email contains:
DISCLAIMER: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
I mean it's like strictly prohibited and you should delete this e-mail from your system and whatever you do you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail under penalty of death apparently!
I usually respond with "Make me!
WFT?!? How can you say that with a straight face? You say you have nothing against the rich except of course that they make to much money. You bestow upon something that doesn't exist and that you don't identify ("the system") as if it has bestowed wealth onto an individual and has agency. Nothing could be further from the truth. People make money because they produce value, value that other people gladly part with their wealth to attain. Nobody's holding guns to anybody's heads and forcing them to part with their hard earned cash. Everybody purchases *willingly*.
And you provide absolutely no fucking evidence nor reason why it should be anything else other than presumably you just don't like it. Well who the fuck are you? Obviously somebody who has failed in his own wealth creating efforts.
You need to understand how capitalism works WRT how trademarks work. Ron Paul's name is trademarked. Trademark law dictates that you must defend your trademarks or you lose them. If he loses them then he stands to lose a lot more in terms of books, speaking fees, etc. While ronpaul.com may be benign right now there is no guarantee that it will remain that way. So, he must defend his trademark. I see nothing wrong, nor non-libertarian in this action. In a truly libertarian world this might be different. But you have to work in the context of the system that you find yourself in.
Fast, cheap, good: pick two.