Oh, for God's sake. Mention "censorship" and bring out the etymology nazis...

If what Amazon is doing - refusing to sell something because they object to it on a moral basis - what is it? What word defines that act? "Amazon Private-company-selling-whatever-legal-products-they-wish Expands" isn't a very snappy title, after all. Neither is "Amazon Doing-something-that-is-unworthy-of-discussion-because-amazon-is-not-the-government-and-their-actions-are-not-covered-by-the-first-amendment Expands". "Censorship" is the best word we've got to describe that act, so until we can agree on a better word, we'll continue using it. Now can you please stop jamming up the entire fscking comments section with 500 repeats of "They're a private company!" every time we talk try to bring corporate censorship to the attention of people who do care?

Sigh... for the millionth time, yes, it is censorship, it's just not government censorship and therefore not illegal censorship (in the US). It's still censorship. That's what the fucking word means, for Christ's sake.

I'm a little shocked at all the negativity. Have you people used X? If Ubuntu can drive a replacement, let them drive a replacement!

X is a part of any proper Unix.

Proper Unix doesn't have any graphical display capabilities at all.

Now get off my lawn.

Wait wait wait... are you trying to say that food, shelter, clothes & utilities stimulate the economy better than cars, houses and jets (or even drugs)? Either way somebody's paying somebody else to do something. Cars, houses, jets and even drugs are actually better economy stimulators because the profit margin is higher.

Well, I think that you're ugly, and I don't want to see your face. Put a bandana or a burqua over it or stay inside all the time or something. Have some respect for the rights of other people not to have to look at your face.

we all agree to respect the feelings of others even if we disagree with them

Oh, my God... the irony of you insisting that he should be more tolerant is going to create a rip in the space-time continuum...

Which is particularly ironic since the only reason they're considered sexually charged in the first place is the obsession with keeping them hidden.

I'm disappointingly unsurprised that I'm only 10% of the way through the comments, and I've already seen this exchange:

Pojut: if you show a titty, you face a big fine

Anonymous Coward: you're in favour [sic] of porn during kid's prime time

If somebody makes a good point, indignantly insist that he said something else. American debate at its finest.

It sure would be nice if the author could figure out how to write something that anybody BESIDES a raving, rabid fanboy of either series could make any sense of. I haven't memorized either of those movies, I'm ashamed to say...

You only look like one of those "free market" fanatics.

Yeah! Down with the "free market"! I'd like to see those fanatics name one good thing that has ever come from the so-called "free" market!

this is just a case of the old boys club sticking together to keep their perks.

Yeah, let's keep up the fight for equality until no man can find employment!

You mean, you were there, and you personally saw it happen? If not, then all you know is that an accusation was made... and the employer/school/etc. did whatever it took to cover it up. In other words, you're doing EXACTLY what he said the problem is, which explains why the employer/school/etc. has to do whatever it takes to cover it up - because you (and 75% of the rest of the world) immediately presume guilt.

The internet is being taken over by 19-year-old college kids who know everything because their feminist professors told them so. Keep fighting, and know we're behind you - I can't mod you up because I lost my right to mod points years ago... for downmodding feminist/liberal trolls!

"Putting the accuser on trial" is feminist double-speak for "suggesting, no matter how delicately, that it might have been consensual and that she might be lying." In other words, you're doing EXACTLY what elrous0 suggests is the fundamental problem here.