Submission + - Is Lily a Drone? Or Is It a Camera? (ieee.org)
An anonymous reader writes: Antoine Balaresque and Henry Bradlow have developed an autonomous flying video camera for use in filming action sports on land and water, capturing scenery while hiking and sightseeing, and covering family events (so everyone gets in the picture). They think they’ve made it simple enough that a parent could just toss it in the air and forget about it while coaxing a child to take her first steps. They have enough seed money ($1 million in investment) to get the prototype they’ve been developing for the past year into production. The technology is coming along nicely; they’ve been able to hire the experts in computer vision, controls, and industrial design that they need, and they’re on track to ship in February 2016.
But they have a problem. Their product looks an awful lot like a drone—and they don’t want to be a drone company, they want to be a camera company. Has drone technology evolved to the point that it's not a drone--in the same way a smart coffeemaker is not a computer--and they really can call this a camera, not a drone?
But they have a problem. Their product looks an awful lot like a drone—and they don’t want to be a drone company, they want to be a camera company. Has drone technology evolved to the point that it's not a drone--in the same way a smart coffeemaker is not a computer--and they really can call this a camera, not a drone?