It is the belief that Darwin's Theory of Evolution (with later minor revisions and adjustments) is the explanation of how evolution works. As long as something is a theory you are open to other explanations, but you can believe that this particular theory is the right one due to overwhelming evidence that still does not prove it as hard irrefutable fact.

Sustainable but temporary. Maybe it's just because English isn't my first language but I really fail to see how you can have both; or why you would WANT both.

Which is why the car should have a series of profiles installed, perhaps fingerprint reading or voice recognition to determine which person is 'driving' the car.

So when little Bobby gets in the car and with his squeaky six year old voice says to take him to Kentucky the car just goes "I can't let you do that, Bobby." Because little Bobby has two allowed destinations: School and Home.

The key word is CAN. Take a look at one of the recent stories about HP cutting off another sixteen thousand jobs.

I did? Which one of them, the first or the second? And looking at my post I don't see what you mean, could you be more precise?

And generally, the number of a tool's users with a problem at any given day SHOULD be << the number of developers or support staff.

I see what you did there.

Was that an intended typo or a Freudian slip?

Showing CAM rips?

That's gotta count as cruel and unusual punishment.

The question, then, becomes obvious: Is it more likely that the perp will take your gun and shoot you (there has got to be statistics for this somewhere) or that the identifying electronics will fail and render the gun inert?

Furthermore, should it be obvious to the guy being aimed at that the gun is inert? Just the threat of being shot might be enough to deter a lot of people.

Because they carry several hundred people at any given time, probably.

You don't think people spend 270 dollars on their hobby?

And yet he yanked a rib out of Adam. I smell a malpractice lawsuit in the making.

And I am sure that whoever receives your 'report' will handle it with utmost dilligence. After all, in Slashdot's lifetime a whopping ONE comment has been deleted due to serious legal threats.

So Margaret Thatcher was worse than, say, Hitler or Kim Jung-Un?