Its not proof that you were knowingly in possession of them. I believe that is the standards to meet too. For instance, i could slip something into your drink or food or have residue on something you are supposed to handle (money, car seat, whatever).

Testing positive is proof of nothing other than you tested positive for some reason.

20k is child's play. It isn't the value of his post, it is the duress in which it was forced to be made.

Really?? Are you that stupid that you think the only way to change government is via violent revolution? I suppose you also think that whatever warlord replaces it will be the kind and gentle type that will gie you everything you ever wanted too.

I think people like you are dangerous to any thriving society and downright deadly to any less than thriving society. You will attract other idiots and eventually get them killed while justifying the jackboot tactics the government would use in response. Some twit in office will look at your writings and you will convince them that spying on citizens is just and reasonable. They will lower the bar for police killings and make a list of domestic terrorist. You will justify this by your own words.

Let's just hope they think you are little more than a retarded monkey that doesn't need to get on the list.

Won't happen in the US ever. Won't happen in the UK either. What might happen is an English version of Tiananmen square. Both governments will see it happening before it happens and it will be put down quickly. Thinking otherwise is little more than an invitation to be put down sooner than later.

When idiots like Ron Paul can rake billions in campain contributions through small personal donations and remain a senator for several terms while not only running for higher office and repeatedly failing yet influencing those who won to some degree, it is proof that what you say is nothing more than crying that it is too hard for you to understand how to do it.

And yes, i say idiots because they failed to moderate their niche message enough to attract mainstream support yet had huge success operating from other people's money. Why is others can do this but in spite of available evidence you think it's impossible?

Rich people do not tend to spend much of their own money to run for office. They spend other people's money. If enough people think the same way you do, getting the money to run will not be a problem. If they do not, then you have to either realize the status quo is what the public wants or convince them of the error of their ways. Either way it can largely be done by donations if you are not some kook. And even if you are, there are a lot of kooks who give it a lot better shot than you seem willing to give.

Maybe it is you who should just go back to bed and lay down. It's obvious that you already have and just want to cry that your doing nothing is not making the change you want. At least if you stay in bed, you wouldn't be polluting the efforts of other good people and maybe they can do what you think is too hard to even try doing.

I love it when idiots claim to know the obvious but fail to see it. Ron paul in the states ran verry little tv ads nor sucked up to any corporations and had quite alarge and popular following that generated huge amounts of donations.

All i heard is crying that its too dificuly. But thats just code for not everyone thinks the way you do. You don't start at the top either, You generally start at the bottom or mid level and work up.

But hell, lets just pick impossible goals, go at them in the most difficult ways, then wear our tears of defeat as a badge of honor while crying that its some huge conspiracy by corporations and whatever other boogerman of the month. That way it can always be some others fault and you have something to constantly bitch, moan, and cry about.

You can change that. Run for office yourself and refuse to become a corporate whore. Talk to friends and family and encourage others to do the same. That's what democracy is about - not just whining about what you don't like.

The poster's intent was to show the ignorance his ideals and beliefs stem from by. Of course you know that which is why you posted it and why you look silly defending it

Where does your link say that? I searched and couldn't find any reference to NASA.

Nothing escaped anybody. You do not know it was a typo because the poster has never clarified it. For all we know he could be confusing bumfuckistan and Mexico with Canada or something.

And that was my response to it. IS all that made up bullshit like the barbaric and civilized BS. Many Europeans considered it civilized to murder, rape and otherwise kill the uncivilized in the new world all the way from Columbus's discovery to the Native American Indians. That term has been used to bring about so much death that it simply doesn't fit the context.

What country has 52 states? Is this one of those 87.3 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot things?

Sigh.. You can bring a horse to water but you cannot make it drink. In certain environments, that can also cause or risk your own death/health.

The problem is freedom, you cannot force it onto people and still be free. Sure it is a betrayal but lets be honest or perhaps realistic, it is only a betrayal by this guy and his brother (speed bump or whatever his name was). The rest of his family and all the others taken in as refugees, even if they are sympathetic by circumstance or familiar relation, haven't crossed that ideal of betrayal. This guy was brought in by his parents and likely not of his own choice although I doubt he rejected the idea. So lets be conscious about this enough to not allow corruption of blood.

And no, while a .22 will do the job just fine, I think it is important to give this guy every legal chance possible to dispel the concept of it being a show trial and summery execution. People have already stated they think he was set up. But a good and thorough appeals process along with exhaustive exercising of his rights will show not only that justice is fair, but that what he betrayed is better than him.

Doesn't need to bring the dead people back. Killing him and figuring out why people get radicalized doesn't have to be mutually exclusive either. It's not like that money is the only money in the world and it's magically gone if he dies.

Lol.. first, there are more blacks killed by blacks in Chicago since the ferguson incident than all blacks killed by cops in the last 5 years. But hey, perspective is not important is it?

The comment was about people who think abortion clinics were set up to control the undesirable minority population and the reply was the someone knew a black guy with so many kids that he had work a second job so it was somehow justified. That's racist whether you like it or not so take uppity ass elsewhere and cry about your life.

Yes, because no white guy would ever have children by more than one person or never get a divorce and move on with their life. Just gotta stop or slow down darkie from multiplying right?

I don't know if you realize how racist that sounded but it also misses and illustrates the point. Even if it wasn't meant to be racist, it has the overtones that someone can recognize.