Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:What are the questions? (Score 2) 313

I wouldn't be so sure. Recent modelling to update the 'nuclear winter' theory has not only shown that the theory is most likely valid, but actually far worse than the model that the Soviets and US came up with in the 1980s. Our current best modelling shows that even a hypothetical regional exchange with as few as 50 Nagasaki-sized weapons on each side between India and Pakistan would cause a "nuclear autumn" bad enough to cause famine in many countries, and a growing season shortened by 60 days the first year after this hypothetical war.

An exchange using the remaining weapons of the former Soviet Union and the United States - well, nuclear winter is a misnomer. Nuclear six month long night is a better description. Daytime lighting conditions in the aftermath of such an exchange would reach no more than that of a moonlit night. Continental temperatures would fall very low, and if this hypothetical war were to happen in the growing season, that's all of your food gone. Water would be hard to get as it would be frozen over. Coastal areas would be milder, but be lashed by constant violent storms due to the temperature difference to the extremely cold inland temperatures. Since the soot would be lofted to the stratosphere, there is no mechanism that will rapidly bring it down and the climatic effects would last long enough that the decade after the war would be a truly miserable experience, and most likely fatal. Those who managed to survive this would then have to deal with a world with no ozone layer and no manufacturing industry to make sunblock. Growing crops would be extremely difficult in those conditions.

We have detonated over 1800 nuclear bombs in the last 60 years. Most of these were bigger than the Nagasaki bomb, in many cases many many times bigger. If what you claim is possible it would have already happened.

Comment Re:What are the questions? (Score 1) 313

In the USAF (my employer - I'm a former Active Duty civilian), Operational Flying and the career fields that support it are doing quite well, and those that fail to make Major or have some other issue are pushed to UAVs. But yes, as some Lt or Captain in a bunker, you might want to plan an "after-USAF" career. We'll probably always have nukes, but it's a small career field getting smaller with no analog on the "outside".

Think wider. There will always need to be some cross-training done, but 'sits in a bunker waiting to act' does actually cover a number of fields. 911 operator, for example. The cheating is very bad, but for somebody with at clean record and at least a Bachelour's, 911 mostly consists of waiting in a building for a phone call, then working through checklists on the basis of the phone call. Dispachers, sitting watch on non-critical bits of nuclear plants(or getting the training TO sit the critical watches), etc...

Power plant operators need to be highly skilled with a strong technical backround. There are often checklists but often there is no time to refer to them, even in routine day-to-day operations. They need to take swift action with initiative in many cases, and millions of dollars of equipment is at stake. "Someone who can follow a checklist" doesn't cut it.

I have seen a lot of ex-navy guys in these roles, and they don't quite cut it IMO. The navy of the 1940s/1950s probably turned out knowledgable engineers, but with today's contractor-heavy military, if something breaks they usually rely on the backups and a contractor swaps out the broken equipment when they get back to port.

Comment Repurpose existing equipment (Score 5, Interesting) 723

Why would you buy 500 snowplows and salt trucks and have them sit around for 1,000 days, waiting for the next event?""

That's why you repurpose existing equipment. Snowplows themselves aren't a huge investment, and they last basically forever with little maintenance. Put a clause in your purchasing specs that all newly purchased garbage trucks and DOT dump trucks must have hookups for a plow. Retrofitting is expensive but if you're buying a truck anyway, the additional cost isn't much. Even dump trucks without special spreading equipment can be used; some dump trucks have small sliding gates on the main gate like this one. This is normally used for shoveling out small quantities of asphalt when patching roads, but in a pinch you could open them up and spread salt/sand on the road. Get creative! Making plans is cheap.

Comment Re:so what about all my old devices? (Score 4, Insightful) 254

and i mean the ones that sell the same device over many years like a game console. PS3, xbox 360, wii u, nintendo 3ds, etc and then you have something like printers. sure it's only $100 or $250 but no one wants to buy a new printer just to buy a new wifi router

If you want to gain the advantages of the newest router you might, GASP, just have to run a wire to it. You might even have the inconvenience of having to relocate it next to the printer. Oh the humanity.

Things that absolutely need wireless tend to be mobile. Mobile equipment which only takes 802.11b was probably obsolete years ago. For everything that doesn't move, it should be wired anyway.

Comment Re:Whats so special about 30th (Score 3, Insightful) 178

Whats so special about 30th anniversary? Is 30 some kind of magic number?

I believe in western culture that 25th anniversary is a special celebration for married couples, (silver) and also 50th (gold) And some cultures have special significance of 15th bithday, and/or 21st birthday

It is roughly a generation. I've gone back in my family tree about 20 generations and 30 years is just about the average difference between parents and child. Yes, even back in medeival times.

I suppose you could consider it special because it means that people who grew up with computers of that era are now buying pocket supercomputers for their children.

Comment Re:Colonialism??? (Score 1) 398

Doesn't using the phrase "an immigrant would be required to 'live and work' in Detroit for an undetermined length of time" sound a lot like an indentured labour program?

Yes. This whole idea is completely contrary to the American ideal of immigration. A permanent resident visa should is, should be, and always has been, for the entire country. You should no more be able to stop immigrants from moving anywhere in the country they want, than you should citizens. Something about the Constitution making this a united country, and the federal government controlling immigration.

No, it actually isn't that much of a stretch. We have visas that tie residency to a certain company sponsoring the visa. If you change companies before citizenship becomes available, the new company has to sponsor you (which many companies don't care to do). So effectively the person is tied to that company in most cases. Tying a person to a specific geographical area isn't that much of a reach, but it is a terrible idea. Each desperate location will offer bigger and bigger incentives, create a race to the bottom, and the immigration system will be even worse than now.

Comment Re:US paying Europe for emissions... (Score 1) 259

There is a huge difference between making a law and applying a law, obviously. This is just standards, not what you will actually find when you measure.

But here you go:

Tell me about it - next to your air quality limits, here are the actual figures for High-tech zone, Shijiazhuang at http://aqicn.org/. China: SO2: 20ug/m^3 (60 in urban areas) - actual 60 NOx: 50ug/m^3 - actual 73 PM10: 40ug/m^3 (70 in urban areas) - actual 546!!!!!!! Ozone: 160 ug/m^3 - actual 3 CO: 10000 ug/m^3 - actual 0

Note that this is a point-in-time value. So, the laws are actually somewhat better than the US, but apparently nobody follows the law.

Not sure I believe this. I can't imagine how you get PM that high without a lot of CO too. The only way I can think of would be using a leafblower (an electric one) on a pile of dust.

Comment Re:That's interesting (Score 2) 444

For the past 11 years, I used nothing but Seagate drives in my builds for clients. Over those past 11 years, I built something like 20 systems a month (on average) with occasional large scale orders of 200. The number of failed Seagates I could count *on one hand* YMMV clearly, but I stand behind Seagates.

Some of this may be peculiar to where you are sourcing your drives from and how carefully they ship. The same drive on Amazon vs Newegg usually has dramatically different ratings. I don't think the hard drive vendors are making drives of different quality for different retailers, but the retailers definitely have different packing and shipping standards.

Comment Re: Return it to the Interviewer! (Score 1) 692

Consider my response to that: "Oh, I already know how it's doing. I did my research on your company. I want to know if you know how your own company's stock's doing, and how your view of it matches up with the analysts' take on your company.". If the interviewer's willing to BS me about the company's performance and how it's handling itself, what else are they BSing me on? And if they honestly don't realize how their company's performing, I have to wonder whether there's some fundamental dysfunction that I may not want any part of.

This is a terrible question. Any manager who is at all knowledgeable about their own company's stock price is a company I probably don't want to work for. It hints that they put the stock price in high regard, when for the customers and the employees it should be last on their list of things to care about.

Comment Re:Mythbusters (Score 1) 292

Forget fiction. I would like to know how dangerous the Mythbusters think the situation is.

Their tests on trying to create a manhole explosion was really interesting. They found they needed the right mix of air and methane, and a cluttered sewer pipe caused the fire to spread more effectively than a clear pipe.

For example, the 50% concentration mentioned in TFA is way too concentrated to produce a big boom.

Yes but at some point that concentration was zero. Now it is 50%. There must have been a point in the middle where the methane was within the explosive limit. Getting exactly the right conditions for an explosion may be difficult but with thousands of leaks it happens eventually.

Comment Re:Real time. (Score 1) 112

The interesting part is the in "real time" bit.

However in that I am even doubtful unless they are using very large values for "real" time.

Anyone that has worked with this kind of data will tell you A) it is usually HUGE, and B) marginally compresses. Data has to be sent from satellite to ground. That means transmission. At what speed? Unless they have discovered a way of sending data magically faster than the rest of the world, it is still constrained by that.

Oh yes. Sending realtime video from a satellite to earth is a problem that absolutely nobody can crack. Hint: they aren't imaging the entire planet at 1m resolution at the same time.

Comment Re:Bitcoin is vulernable to government manipulatio (Score 1) 396

So what? Why does the price of bitcoin even matter? Bitcoins strength lies in its ability to be used as a payment processing network - ......

Bitcoins power lies in using it as a payment processing network not its price. It does need some more price stability, however, so this crazy speculation needs to stop.

If Bitcoin is too volatile to be useful as a payment method, it is pretty useless. I'm sure you will argue that "as more people use Bitcoin, the volatility will decrease", but historical data shows that to be the opposite of reality. More people use Bitcoin than ever, and it is more volatile than ever. Potentially losing 20% on a currency shift in a transaction is far, far worse than the absolute certainty of paying Visa 2-3% for the same transaction.

Comment Re:People must be free (Score 2) 323

Free market finds a way. Where gov't erects legal barriers, free market becomes black market.

You are right, but if the 'free market' were an argument for making something legal, then we should make assassinations and corporations that dump poison into rivers legal, because they are going to anyway.

A terrible argument. Marijuana is basically harmless, yet it is outlawed. The drug makes you relaxed and the user watches movies or listens to music, usually in their own home or a friend's home. I have never heard of other crimes such as breaking and entering, theft, violence (unrelated to black markets), or robbery as a result of a user's pot habit. At worst, it could be argued that it makes a person lazy. There are plenty of lazy people in the world though, and we don't light fires under them for their laziness. Society shouldn't care about this drug at all.

Assassinations and poisoning rivers is harmful to society. It should be obvious that your argument isn't applicable.

Comment Re:Yeah No. (Score 1) 203

Last I checked, $1 sent by any other money transfer service was still $1 once it got to the other side (ignoring fees, which are fixed and known in advance). With Bitcoin, that $1 might be worth $1.2 or $0.7 by the time it gets to the other side's bank account. That isn't a very smart way to transfer money around unless you have a strong need to hide your transaction from someone.

Slashdot Top Deals

"If I do not want others to quote me, I do not speak." -- Phil Wayne

Working...