Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:People are willing to trust some random softwar (Score 1) 251

Yea, remotely possible, but there are just too many eyes on the Tor project to make it realistically likely.

If we can't trust even the most thoroughly reviewed projects, then we really can't trust anything except burning brands and pitchforks as tools of political change.

Comment Re:People are willing to trust some random softwar (Score 1) 251

Who's to say that Silk Road, Bit Coin, TOR etc aren't all just honeypot projects for the NSA?

Because the people involved in some of them are all well known non-Government types, especially Tor. Besides, even if it were an NSA honeypot, the code is thoroughly understood and vetted, the protocol openly implemented and the actual servers are controlled by a very large number of disparate people and orgs.

Even if it DID start out as an NSA honeypot, they can't be getting too much from it as it does deliver well on its promise.

Comment Re:Buggy whips? (Score 2) 769

Coal is about the only reliable and cheap source of power that we have enough raw materials for for several hundred years into the future

If we continue burning coal at the current rate, civilization as we know it will not exist several hundred years in the future.

Comment Re:Buggy whips? (Score 5, Insightful) 769

This is a very real problem

No, it's not really. The world has survived plenty of instances of entire technological paradigms becoming obsolete. Fossil fuels will become obsolete sooner or later, and the world will be better off for it. It's just a question of how long the elite (like the Koch brothers) can hold the welfare of the entire world hostage to their pointless shell game.

Comment Re:Can we reject this crap preemptively? (Score 1) 88

What you describe is a "law above laws", that serves as a guide to legislative actions and that reflects the underlying values of the society that we don't want legislated away by the whims of the parliament of the day.

This is the role of the constitution. And yes, the modern world does need a right to private communications or something similar to be included, because the current protections included in it just don't cover the manners in which modern abuses of power can manifest.

Comment Re:Are you kidding (Score 5, Insightful) 818

In many European countries, citizens' rights are upheld, they are not treated like cattle for the crime of wanting to travel through an airport, they are not taxed to breaking point to fun pointless wars that enrich a tiny, politically connected clique, they have access to free education and healthcare and they have faster access to the internet.

You can argue about definitions of "aristocracy" and who is or is not in de facto control until you're blue in the face. However, the outcomes speak for themselves.

Comment Re:fixing the parent posting (Score 1) 311

I don't think they'd need to game it that much. They'd need a random dispersion of a large number of holes on that square to achieve the result, and I don't think that getting close to that ideal would be difficult given a large number of discharges at the target using fine shot shells. The law of large numbers would be in their favour.

Slashdot Top Deals

The rule on staying alive as a program manager is to give 'em a number or give 'em a date, but never give 'em both at once.

Working...