Huh? The statement "Schizophrenia is not orthogonal to intelligence" does not say that schizophrenia == intelligence (while your own statement says that schizophrenia != intelligence), it says that just because someone is schizophrenic it does not mean that they're not intelligent.

Why would they do that when it hasn't even come to the courts yet? This is about the prosecutor wanting to conduct an interview in Sweden, and refusing to go outside Sweden to do the interview.

Yeah. But then there's this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

'Padilla was held for three and a half years as an "enemy combatant."'

Although to give you the benefit of the doubt, I don't know what you meant by "speedy".

"Assange is avoiding ARREST"

Well, technically, he's avoiding a hearing on Swedish soil, which really isn't a criminal offense.

I care.

Who's paying for the bandwidth the ads use up? Probably not Mozilla.
What if your connection has a bandwidth cap or you pay per MB for traffic?

You're absolutely right. I didn't really consider that they'd never actually seen it before.

Although one would think that people would think twice when picking and eating mushrooms they have never seen before...

Oh well, people have done things way more stupid than that before.

Those ads have to come from somewhere not local to the workstation FF is running on. That means that they eat bandwidth. What if you have a bandwith cap? What if you have to pay for each MB of traffic?

If they do this, its bye-bye FF for me :(

I really think it "glitch".

The Death Cap is something I learned as a child not to touch, and I teach my kids that too. It's pretty common where I live to learn which things in nature are edible and what to watch out for. I had the impression most people around the world had that kind of education "built in". Is that not the case in the US these days?

Everyone is already a criminal. It's just a matter of finding what crime they're guilty of.

What frequency and power is this? Standing in front of a real radar transmitter is basically like cramming yourself into a microwave oven and hitting the power switch. Not so healthy. And he's basically saying that "It's a small radar transmitter"

You're way to gullible.
"Indefinitely" in political terms is more or less equivalent to "permanently".

"He had a different name for it; he mentioned it frequently."
Really? Sounds more like you misunderstanding what he meant.

"You just aren't up on reading comprehension for the stupidest of the Apple Haters."
Apple hater? Sounds more like your own reading comprehension skills could use a bit of attention.

"That is an incredibly ignorant statement. iOS has been since the beginning chock full of battery life optimizations"
Where did he mention iOS/iPhone? He could be comparing two Android phones, you know...

So, to paraphrase yourself: "That is an incredibly ignorant statement.".

Why not just pull the warning labels off everything they use and let the problem sort itself out?