Comment Re:Ban them, forever. (Score 1) 301
Put the car makers under the same strict regulations that the airplane autopilot manufacturers are.
It's the same principle just a different amount of passengers.
four to six instead of fifty +.
Put the car makers under the same strict regulations that the airplane autopilot manufacturers are.
It's the same principle just a different amount of passengers.
four to six instead of fifty +.
>.> so they think pixie dust causes darker skin or the other differences in the 'races' instead of genes or the change in the expression of genes..
I did not till tonight.
At&t blocked my access to slashdot because of the posting of that article about their fake fiber roll out.
Move to japan, that is their system.
That was $498 dollars worth of dogecoin.
At least i am thinking it will have you sign up for a facebook account during the driver install.
As long as it costs less than 1 trillion(the f-35's current running total) it is not only a match but a good counter.
I think they may of read a little too much into said anime's plot...
When enough people realizing voting is not worth the paper or electrons that make up the ballot.
Are they going to share their patches to stuff like the open source radeon driver, the open source nvidia driver, and mesa to upstream?
They might just say 'we will give you all the source for our linux distribution, except the steam client(obviously), the streaming client, and any in house made performance enhancements.'
Which are shortcuts to where they are installed in wine.
I used to think like this, but that was before I had a job at a major mail order prescription company.
Middle management tried to impress upper management by purchasing a one million dollar automated packing system, in theory it could do thousands of orders a day.
Far outclassing a single human packer at a packing station.
It only did that occasionally, why?
It was a dumb automated machine, ONE little deviation and it stopped working.
This was on top of other stuff on it not working like printing the wrong order's paper work, it throwing a fit if the rx's did not come down the line in the exact order it expected.
It also did not care if for instance the printers messed up, or the paper came out non flat causing the grabber arm to get it stuck on it.
This is the general problem with automation fantasies, physicly it may be possible to replace the human doing the job with a machine.
But the machine is no where near as fault tolerant as a human.
If one of these machines encounters a minor error such as product being out of order, or objects not being 'exactly' where it expects it to be, they stop at best and at worst ignoring it causing more problems.
For a human worker it's just a fraction of a second routine correction.
I used to think like this, but that was before I had a job at a major mail order prescription company.
Middle management tried to impress upper management by purchasing a one million dollar automated packing system, in theory it could do thousands of orders a day.
Far outclassing a single human packer at a packing station.
It only did that occasionally, why?
It was a dumb automated machine, ONE little deviation and it stopped working.
This was on top of other stuff on it not working like printing the wrong order's paper work, it throwing a fit if the rx's did not come down the line in the exact order it expected.
It also did not care if for instance the printers messed up, or the paper came out non flat causing the grabber arm to get it stuck on it.
This is the general problem with automation fantasies, physicly it may be possible to replace the human doing the job with a machine.
But the machine is no where near as fault tolerant as a human.
If one of these machines encounters a minor error such as product being out of order, or objects not being 'exactly' where it expects it to be, they stop at best and at worst ignoring it causing more problems.
For a human worker it's just a fraction of a second routine correction.
It is easier to change the specification to fit the program than vice versa.