I recently bought a Radeon HD 7850 2GB card that I'm pretty sure has ECC. Cost was $200. It's pretty cool - if you overclock the memory too high, the card doesn't start crashing your games or anything, it just doesn't run any faster.

To my knowledge, all graphics cards with GDDR5 memory have ECC.

This BFG edition is a JOKE compared to the mods (100% made by volunteer work) I've been playing lately. I've seen volunteer effort replace almost ALL the textures with HD textures (very nicely done, looks like professional quality), add in bloom/HDR, add in parallax occlusion mapping (high-end computers only!), add in new monsters, and probably more I'm forgetting. Just get a $10 or $5 copy of the Doom 3 from 2004 and get some of these FREE mods, and the game will look so good you'll think it was made in 2010 or 2011 and it's TOTALLY worth playing it again with them installed. And if you're a pussyshit who plays with the room lights turned on and you don't understand the word "atmosphere", then YES, you can get a mod to tape a flashlight to your gun. A short list of the best mods (Note: these mods can be a son of a bitch to install, especially if you want more than one. I'd advise you just get the mod from the bottom-most URL if you want a painless experience):

Perfected Doom 3 (adds HDR bloom and other effects)

Wulfen (High-Def) Texture Pack (lots of HD textures and parallax maps for them)

HD Mod (e-z to install compilation of many other high-def mods)

Think about it... there can only be two kinds of people who behave according to "game theory":
-Economists
-Psychopaths

I'm planning on watching this BBC Documentary this weekend; it looks like the first segment discusses game theory.

Well, the tearing effect in particular bothers me because oftentimes I like to read the contents of a window while I am moving it. I think a window manager with functionality as the #1 priority should try as hard as possible to never obscure the contents of a window.

I know what you mean about desktop eye candy slowing things down... it's one of the reasons I made the switch from Mac OS X to Windows 7 a few years ago; Windows is more responsive, even with the unnecessary "aero" bullhooey enabled. Linux isn't really an option for me because I run an ATI (er, sorry, AMD) graphics card, and I hear that combination is a rarefied circle of hell.

What do you find "crappy" about the Ford GT's interior? I thought it looked kinda nice, if a little bit plastic-y and vulgar.

The current-generation Corvettes are more interesting to me, though. They don't look as good as the Ford GT on the outside, but I think that's because Chevy let their engineers decide EVERYTHING about that car. It is the only honest-to-god sports car I know of where the design team thought that COST was an important aspect of engineering.

Yes, the interior is cheap chevy parts-bin crap, but it's easier to live with when you know you've got a car that can overtake cars like Ferrari F430s and F360s, Zondas, and Gallardos, all for about $30,000 to $40,000 for one in like-new condition.

war4peace:
I was in your exact position a few months ago. My Core 2 Duo E4300 wasn't cutting it for new games like Crysis 2 or LA Noire even though I had it overclocked +66% to 3000Mhz, fairly close to the same performance as your E6750. So I decided it was time for an upgrade, and I set out looking for the cheapest CPU that could handle any modern game at around 40 fps or more.

I was all set to buy a brand new cpu+motherboard+ram kit from newegg, but at the last minute I checked on eBay and I found it was cheaper to just get a quad-core cpu for my old socket 775 system. After all, I already had plenty of fast DDR2-800 memory and I was 100% satisfied with my Gigabyte 965P-DS3 motherboard, so why chuck them out if I can still make use of them? Instead of paying $230+ for a Sandy Bridge Core i3 2100 kit, I just bought an old Core 2 Quad Q6700 for about $125, and sold my old E4300 a week later for $25 to recoup some of the money I spent. The Q6700 is great... it's basically two E6750s glued together on one package, and at stock clocks it is about 90%-100% as fast in modern multi-threaded games as a core i3 2100, which would have cost just as much as my Q6700 for the cpu alone, never mind the new board and memory I would need. And really I probably paid a little too much for the Q6700 at $125... if you are patient I bet you can get a used Q6700 for $80-$100 off eBay or maybe Craigslist. One tip if you go the used route: make sure the cpu was just pulled out of some some boring office workstation computer from 2007. You do NOT want a cpu that once lived in some 14-year-old's gaming pc that was overclocked to the max with some $20 off-brand power supply.

The TDP for the Q6700 is 95W because it uses the dual-die 65nm "Kentsfield" design, but even so I think your Scythe heatsink (good choice on that, by the way...) should have no trouble handling 95W quietly. But if 95W still sounds like it's just too much heat for you, you might want to look into the 45nm "Yorkfield" chips, if I recall correctly they vary between 65W and 95W. Be aware, though, that not all socket 775 motherboards will support 45nm CPUs, even if you flash to the latest BIOS. You'll want to check with your motherboard vendor to make sure that your model supports 45nm chips (my Gigabyte 965P-DS3 does not support them, else I would have purchased a 45nm Q9650 with a better clock rate and more L2 cache than a Q6700).

Oh, just remembered something about the Q6700 - if you leave it at or below stock frequency (2666 Mhz), it will almost certainly tolerate a good deal of under-volting, (your motherboard almost certainly supports voltage control if you can overclock with it). In my case, stock voltage is 1.27500V, but I got it down to 1.12500V, totally stable through 72 hours of torture testing. This reduced the cpu power consumption from 95 W to 73 W, based on this wattage calculator.

Lately I've been gaming with headphones, so noise is not much of issue anymore, and I've found that I can get my Q6700 up to 3333 Mhz at 1.40000V (this is on a mediocre Thermaltake i1 heatsink) completely stable through 72 hours torture testing, temperatures between 44 C idle and 77 C full load, (last I checked, the "Kentsfield" Core 2 Quads are good to go at any overclock so long as they stay both under 1.50000V and under 80 C). At this overclocked speed, my 5-year-old Q6700 beats out a Core i3 2100 pretty handily. Overclocked, my Q6700 consumes a ton of power at 143 W (+51% more than stock power consumption), but it's getting chilly at my latitude this time of year and I could use a space heater anyway :P. Still, the +25% boost to clock speed is very noticeable when paired with my Radeon 7850 2GB, especially in cpu-heavy games like LA Noire and Deus Ex: Human Revolution. Btw, the Radeon 7850 is an unbeatable mid/mid-high range graphics card if heat/power consumption is a concern... it's noticeably faster than a GTX 560 Ti and it trades blows with a GTX 570, but it accomplishes this with a TDP of only 130W (!)... and it has double the VRAM. The MSI Twin Frozr 7850 has a particularly quiet heatsink/fan and it's also very overclocking-friendly.

One aspect of the the low to midrange Sandy Bridge / Ivy Bridge chips that shouldn't be overlooked is that the clock generator has moved from the northbridge to the cpu, meaning that YOU CAN'T OVERCLOCK THEM, not more than about +2%, not even on a deluxe $300 motherboard, at least not unless you buy a $250+ "-K" model with an unlocked multiplier (and of course, those "K" models are all top-of-the-line to begin with, faster at stock clocks than any gamer could need right now). I can't help but hate the idea of having unused performance potential in my computer... I hate it almost as much as I enjoy gaming... Looking at forum threads where people post their overclocks, I'm finding that back in 2007/2008, when Core 2 Quads just started hitting stores shelves at $800-$1000, overclockers could achieve 3600 Mhz or 3800 Mhz at around 1.40V to 1.5V on a decent air cooler like your Scythe (4000 Mhz was pretty achievable on water, too).

So long story short, if you have a decent motherboard and enough ram running at a reasonable speed, it will probably amaze you how much of an improvement you'll get just by replacing a 5-year-old CPU with an equally old CPU. People are getting rid of their old Core 2 Quads in droves, and it's a buyer's market out there.

Thank you. I'm going to remember your articulate argument here the next time some jerk calls me a racist for suggesting that we decentralize gov't.

Wow, I need to lay off the beers.

After some more thought, I'd like to retract my previous statement. Child porn should be illegal, but we should still focus more on rehabilitating those found guilty of it. People who want to censor child porn aren't bad or evil.

I think I'll go out and take a walk; thinking about this has made me upset...

I can't speak for the other poster, but while I don't think kiddie porn is "okay", I don't think it should be illegal, either. Criminalizing child porn creates at least two very, very bad incentives for unsavory types.

A. If possession of child porn alone is a crime, child porn can be used as a weapon. Under 18? Create a photo/video of yourself masturbating and put copies on any and every digital device belonging to the victim (for extra points, burn a hundred CDs or DVDs and place them in the victim's house next to as many mailing envelopes so as to show intent to distribute). Tip off the police. Bam, your victim's career is likely over, and he/she will be on the sex offender registry, allowing pedophile-haters to know which house to send a brick flying through the window.

B. Free countries don't send people to prison for having the wrong kind of pictures. It's a free speech issue. People who hate free speech start by criminalizing the easy targets - "hate speech" and child porn, to set a precedent. When you criminalize child porn, you're sending the message that it's not okay to jack off to children, yes. But you're also sending the message that censorship is okay so long as it's just silencing unpopular stuff.

I read Gladwell's book Outliers a few months back. I thought he made some reasonable, if somewhat obvious points, until he went completely off the rails when he discussed differences in math schooling between China and the US.

In short, he said that the way chinese count gives them an edge in learning calculus, because the chinese say the number 13 as "three and ten", building the number out of simpler, more fundamental numbers, whereas in the US children must learn an entirely new word: "thirteen". He ignored how studying calculus concepts like differentials and integrals at a young age (I think around junior high age) is the norm in China, whereas in the US, students only get a watered-down "pre-calc" in their senior year of high school unless they're really ambitious and they take AP classes in their later teens.

There's an excellent review of Outliers that was published in The New Republic available here, for those with a lugubrious interest in learning precisely why we should ignore Gladwell.

The maximum sentence allowed for an offense is usually much greater than the actual sentence rendered in an individual case. I think that in most states, your example of having a joint would probably get you 6-12 months' probation and an expunged criminal record, with no time in jail other than when you're waiting to get released on bail/bond. This is assuming you accept a plea bargain. Even if you went to trial and lost, you would likely not get the full "therapy".

In my state, someone who commits a class "D" felony *CAN* be sentenced to up to 5 years in prison. Class "D" is the least severe type of felony; examples include small-time drug dealing, carrying a gun into a school, and theft of property valued between $1,000 and $10,000). Getting sentenced to the full 5 years only really happens to criminals with long histories. According to the criminal defense attorneys I've spoken to, the sentence for a "D" felony, especially if it is the person's first criminal charge, is almost always 1-2 years' probation. If the person accepts a guilty plea bargain and saves the state the (considerable) expense of going to trial, the person gets the added benefit of having their criminal case history expunged if they complete their probation successfully. Otherwise, there is a "guilty" conviction that requires a pardon from the governor to overturn (good luck with that). Expungement sort of makes it like the whole thing never happened; you are treated as though there was no conviction even though you plead guilty and were given a sentence. Presumably, background checks for rental housing and employment will turn up nothing on you. Of course, if you face ANOTHER criminal charge in the future, the courts will take your previous expunged offense into account and give you a somewhat harsher sentence that time around. I have been told that most states operate more or less like this.

As far as I can tell, the maximum possible sentence is used to scare the hell out of the accused and get them to plead guilty to "make this go away". Nationally, I think 90% of criminal cases are settled by a plea bargain; who knows how many of those people are really guilty (I wonder if pleading guilty to a crime you didn't commit is considered perjury). It saves the courts a lot of money, and many states these days are broke. Slashdot had a story on this recently, I think it was called "How To Crash The Court System".

You mentioned China as an example of how good a government/society headed by engineers can be. And I think you're right. Sort of. China is rapidly growing, old Chinese people especially are astonished at how much richer they've become, and China is on track to be the world's new #1 financial center. However, that's pretty much all you can say in China's favor. With regard to human/civil rights, the environment (!), income inequality, working hours/conditions, and basically every intangible aspect of the country, they are the same or worse than the US.

This isn't surprising, given the nature of the engineering mindset. Engineering is the study of solving rational, material problems (the budget and military are two areas of government where engineering would excel). To solve problems as effectively as possible, you must presume absolute license. You must also regard the problem unsentimentally - if you get emotionally involved with it, you'll cloud your judgment and overlook what could be a better solution. The engineers I know all view politics as a series of "problems" waiting to be solved, rather than the conflicts they actually are. They prize "social efficiency" and "harmony" above principles like dignity, individualism, or limited government. They have contempt for anyone who makes it harder for them to do their jobs.

The reason the US is going down the tubes is because we're becoming too much like China, with its "one right way" philosophy. If we're "falling behind" China, it is only because we are both in a race to the bottom. The really important things in life are compassion, trust, respect, dignity, self-direction, and laughter. Beyond having a decent place to live, having enough food to eat, having a little extra to help out needy family and neighbors, and having access to adequate medical care, and basically having a way to secure the important stuff, money can do very little for you. If you have these things (and I'm fully aware that not all Americans do), why does it matter if another person or another nation is wealthier than you? I thought envy was supposed to be a character flaw or something.

If you're so impressed with China, I would suggest you move there. The US used to have a decentralized, individualistic society that would have been pretty much perfect if it had only treated minorities and women better. "Falling behind" and "getting back on top" are important concerns for an empire, not for a republic.

"The search for a material paradise is a flight away from humanity into the sterile nonlife of mechanisms where everything is perfect until it becomes junk. " -- John Taylor Gatto

I'm pretty confident that's exactly what they'll do in a few years. The day they do that, I will buy at least 1 copy for myself, and possibly more for friends to use at LAN parties or such (screw battle.net, the real Diablo fun goes on entirely in people's basements).

The longer they wait, the lower the price will be when I buy it. So what's it going to be, Blizzard? Want me to give you $50 now or $20 a few years later? I'll be looking at patch logs to see what your answer is.

That is the best strategy we can come up with? Punching CTRL-Z on the whole fossil fuel thing and hoping for the best?

Carbon emissions are integral to our whole way of life. If cutting carbon (especially cutting carbon faster than we already are through market forces like nuclear reactors, electric cars, etc) is the best strategy we have, then we need to find a better strategy!. I thought a lot of the predictions for future temperatures were being made by supercomputers that could run simulations of the entire Earth and produce actionable data. As far as I can tell, the scientists running these nearly-omniscient models have never bothered to adjust a variable other than CO2 concentration (what about sulfate aerosols, for instance?). Perhaps the scientists/UN/policymaker crowd could come up with something a little more practical, something that wouldn't impoverish millions/billions of people. And maybe something that doesn't require global shadow government (Goldman Sachs supports cap-and-trade since it would effectively function as a tax levied/collected by banks) and something that won't put the US/Europe at much more of a disadvantage compared to China/India and other countries that don't/won't give a fuck.

First off, the parent post needs to be modded +6 correct. VERY few ordinary people realize how much power they actually have in the American political process because they obsess over choosing "D" or "R" in the poll booth. I voted for Ron Paul in the Iowa primaries last January, and most people I spoke to just didn't feel going to the primaries was "worth it" (regardless of which candidate they liked). Even though Iowa is one of the most (the most?) important, I just couldn't get them interested.

I'm pretty suspicious that this happens in US Congress as well. It seems like America is moving away from the somewhat Athenian-ish style of democracy it had in the 18th/19th centuries and toward a more Spartan-style "democracy" where an elite group of Ephors makes all the real decisions behind the scenes. We've certainly adopted Sparta's ideals of strict, hierarchical supervision, along with professional soldiers who take up a large part of the budget...