You're so full of shit it's coming out of your mouth...
No, you're full of shit. And, to prove it, I'll now provide exactly twice as much evidence as you did to the contrary:
...
Well Microsoft has a pretty good history of offering long term support
What the Zune are you talking about?
.the stuff just comes out by itself.
Well, if ((age < 2) || (age > 65))
So, then you either get actual attacks happening nobody took seriously. Or the men in dark sunglasses hauling you off in the night for questioning because they're 100% convinced that your threat to drop the condoms, Snickers wrappers, and Depends on Capitol Hill was real.
Which scenario do you think is more likely? Furthermore, if anyone is a real threat, there will be much more intelligence (as in evidence of a threat) surrounding that individual than their tweets. Arresting people based solely on their tweets or FB posts will very rapidly devolve into an outright ban of saying anything critical of government officials or policy -- AKA fascism.
Why not just force Twitter to change TOS to require sarcasm tag?
Or, why not just allow free speech? Why do we have to identify sarcasm? Maybe part of the expression of the message is its ambiguity.
"I am, therefore I am." -- Akira