In regard to your sig, it's "baseball bat", not "baseball club". Have a nice day.

Not only that, but the speed of light is approximately 186k miles per second! Coincidence?

Or Wingz. I remember using Wingz on IBM RISC work stations at the University. It was great.

Ask a black man what he has to go through on a daily basis...

I'm trying to, but Obama won't return my calls.

Striving toward political change is also != anarchy.

It is dissenting data, doofus. This is because it flies in the face of the bullshit claims made by the alarmists that the polar ice caps would be melted by now. And, it's dissenting data, because the anonymous coward I originally responded to, who obviously prefers to suckle at the disinformational teet of the alarmists, wants to bury it.

Yes, hide the dissenting data! Don't look at it! We need to evangelize the narrative, people.

Is that how this science works?

He's a producer you halfwit. Not a DJ

So... is he producing when he wears the mouse head? On a stage?

Not seeing the video is a form of willful apathy, IMHO.

I disagree. I have not watched it, because I am making a conscientious decision to filter input that may (almost certainly) affect my psyche. I'm far from apathetic, though.

Do you believe that we must all view video of a rape to attain any sympathy for the victim?

I made a statement about GPLv2 being more conducive than its successors to project adoption, and you obviously disagree with this statement. Because of this -- because your opinion differs, I'm trolling? You need to go to wikipedia and learn.

(only, no "or later versions clause" unfortunately)

You mean, fortunately. Now, it's more likely to actually be used.

Aaannnd... it wasn't legal before? Oh... I see, you're attempting to associate this behavior with the Hobby Lobby ruling to fit a particular narrative. Gotcha. Carry on...

What kind of tabs do you have open? 2GIGS?! 9 Tabs for me, and I'm at 285 megs:

This page
This one
This one
Dealnews
This one
This one
And, a couple of intranet pages.

He takes an (1) example of a company with obviously poor QA, and turns it into a critique of the free market. ? Sorry, but to make this argument stick, you'd have to show that ALL (or, at least, most) of the companies selling phones operate under this MO. Additionally, you'd have to show that these same problems wouldn't plague a product line in a regulated market scenario. Good luck.

I certainly agree with you, but I would tend to emphasize the environment of innovation over cold war muscle flexing. We won the race largely due to the developments in computer technology that had already happened -- invention of the integrated circuit being key among them. I think you could make an argument that the IC came as a successor to the tech developed during and after WWII, but (and I'm no historian) I believe Fairchild Semiconductor's work was privately funded.