Stop being stupid. There is a ton of risks to flying airplanes that are relevant, this is _not_ one of them.
It is an avoidable risk, in that we can tell idiotic humans to stop flying quadcopters near planes, you fools! Unfortunately, geese and other dumb animals cannot understand us when we tell them this, but humans do... and then choose to ignore it.
These people are presumably buzzing planes on purpose as a "how close can I get" thrill, or to get close-up footage of planes. These are not valid reasons to wilfully and knowingly risk the safety of an aircraft and its passengers. There are laws with names like "reckless endangerment" for this sort of thing....
Except that in the UK, Judges have the ability to nullify a law if they consider it onerous or wrong, without being specifically asked to look at the law itself.
As I understand it, they can only nullify illegal laws, ie laws that are incompatible with other legislation. If the judge finds law Y illegal because it breaches law X, parliament can vote to repeal law X and reaffirm law Y, and the deed is done.
I thought it was to overturn the decisions of national establishment and replace them with decisions made by a supranational establishment instead.
The European courts cannot creat their own laws - they can only uphold laws that member states have willingly signed up to.
Is state snooping on communications against our human rights? Is it against the human rights legislation?
I think everyone agrees that the East German Stasi were violating people's right to privacy. Do we let the UK away with it just through blind faith that it will never be abused? The security services have always employed the private secrets of innocent, uninvolved civilians to blackmail them into working for them.
Hackers of the world, unite!