despite being on the useless placebo 'do not call' list. These idiots, TECLO in Gresham, Oregon 971-220-1002 do not answer when called. Maybe we need a "do not harass" list (like THAT would do any good either). It would be nice to figure out how to use VoIP software to generate robocalls of your own (maybe this exists?), locate the owner of the company and request removal of your number.......200 times a day if necessary. There's gotta be a (legal) way to get these bastards. This particular one is reported to be a phisher-scammer with some credit card angle.

I see where quite a few commenters don't get the attraction. I witnessed a voice contact from a 10W mobile radio in Vermont, to a station in Japan, with full signal strength at around dusk a few days ago (on 28.4MHz). The randomness of where HF propagation will take your signal and from what country an operator will respond makes voice communication interesting, and for me much more so than a cell phone call or an IRC chat session. Amateur radio was the cause of my interest in electronics engineering in the first place and I have made a career out of it, which has been greatly enhanced by my experience in amateur radio. Indeed there are many professionals among the amateur community. As many others have stated well here, the hobby is rich with many engineering genres and the generous frequency allocations make for a vast playground that truly does advance the "art" that underlies all those ubiquitous wired and wireless communications we take for granted. Digital, software defined radio, analog, microwave, satellite communications, power amplifiers, antenna design etc etc etc. How can anyone call this boring? 73 Mike

It sounds like internal NASA politics bullshit. I bet the person at NASA leading the charge to get the camera back would piss themselves at the mere thought of going through the level risk those guys embraced. They would rather have left it on the moon than let an astronaut keep it? IMO that's a tragedy.

Sounds paneful

...and the linux version will be much more powerful and configurable

...get a life! W. Shattner

Exhaustive patent searching in advance of application is the real solution to the problem of knowing whether an innovative idea has been reduced to practice and filed on by someone else. The new rules make searching easier, since no-one can know for sure if the invention existed before but had not been formally filed on. That said the patent examination process should not be burdened with performing the search for the inventor. It is the responsibility of the inventor to determine the existence of all prior art, and now with the new rules, the existence of all previously filed inventions. Obviously the inventor will occasionally miss something in their search that the examiner will catch, causing a bit more work for everyone. On the other hand, some inventors are so paranoid about being first to file, they will slap together an application and file it without giving due diligence to the search step. These new rules are going to exacerbate THAT problem. The real fix would seem to be giving inventors, large and small entities alike, the incentive to do a thorough search of prior art in advance of filing. yes IAAI, 20 issued so far

Sygate Personal Firewall. There is a free version that works pretty well, is quite configurable, has no adware, and does not trash your network settings if you uninstall it. -m