I said no such thing. You put your own words in there. Nobody but a lying cop & a dead guy know the facts.

All I said was that one of the shots got residue on his hands. It could easily have been lots of different ways. At lots of different places. But you only see it one way.

Now we all know you're a fucking joke.

Um, he got shot more than once. More than twice. More than three times.

Perhaps ONE of the six times he was shot, his hands were near the gun.

Which says NOTHING about whether or not he was in the car.

Um, he got shot more than once. More than twice. More than three times. I could go on, but I doubt you'd get the point...

Well, the video that they released didn't show anything either. It was blurry AND from a distance. And they tried to justify that he had a gun from it. Absurd at its best.

Perhaps the other videos showed more than the cops wanted?

Like choking people to death and beating unconscious people?

According to the cop. Who was 'accidentally' not wearing his body camera.

This. This is why there are such trust issues, especially in groups who are repressed by cops.

Careful. You're ruining his world-view there.

All that means was that his hand was within a few feet of the gun when it went off. He could have been defending himself, hiding his body or grabbing for the gun. But there is no proof of one over the other.

Never ridden a bike, have you?

Exactly what happened last night in Berkeley, MO.

Cop 'accidentally' didn't have body camera on. Shot another black kid dead. Claims he pulled a gun.

In spite of 3 other cameras just feet away from the incident, the cops released a blurry video from far away. I wonder why that is?

Odds they get away with it again? 110%.

Context:

It's called a thread.

Context, much?

He was talking about the Faraday cage, not active blocking of WiFi signals. Thus blocking all RF.

How do you know anything has changed?

The CIA refused to give access to over 9000 pages to the torture commission.

They're still hiding a LOT.

Uh, Sony pulled the plug too.

It may have been after the major movie chains did so, but Sony didn't let it go to anyone else either. Until now.

Did they actual show you how it violated those terms, or was it just a vague threat?