Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:I love KSP, but sometimes... (Score 1) 99

There's definitely a time investment and the frustration level can be really high. It can be several aggravating hours to do some complicated things, like "intercept an asteroid that's not passing particularly close, point it back at your home planet and put it in a stable orbit". But there's always easier ways to do things and tricks that make complicated things easier, even without mods. Of course sometimes the answer is to just give up and redesign your ship, or send two ships instead of one.

Tearing your hair our and then finally succeeding is a pretty nice feeling but it's definitely one that I have less time for with a fulltime job, and I can't imagine playing KSP once I have kids (until they're old enough to start learning orbital mechanics...so like, 6).

All that said...some parts of the game are still relatively easy. You can have a hell of a lot of fun with strapping a lot of boosters on and hoping for the best, and you can land on the Mun without a full, deep understanding of what you're doing. Kind of like how you can play adventure games/RPGs without going for 100% completion, I think you can probably get your money's worth without blowing a bunch of time and anger on the hard parts of Kerbal, and without even touching the (excellent) mod scene.

Comment Re:congratulations on the initial release of... (Score 2) 99

So add a few mods that put more displays and controls inside the IVA screen (sitting in the cockpit), tack some unreliable cameras to the outside of your craft, and feel the joy of flying a ship by squinting at computer monitors inside your computer monitor. Docking maneuvers are even hairier than normal, though if you manage to shear off a camera somehow, I guess you always have the old fallback of "send someone outside on EVA and have them radio you that you need to shift left a couple of centimeters". Reentry is exciting because all you have is flames visible through your window (if you have a window), your altitude and descent gauge, and a little icon of your ship over a topo map.

Comment so....why? (Score 0, Offtopic) 94

We get a lot of articles here that people say don't belong on Slashdot, but I usually side with them being good articles. "Stuff that matters" and all that, personal freedoms, general interest to nerds, etc. But this one...no, I'm just not seeing it. Nothing to do with personal freedoms, nothing to do with computers, nothing to do with public policy, absolutely zero effect on any of us, even those of us in the USA. It's just political celebrity news.

Comment Worse than the summary (Score 5, Insightful) 130

The summary made it sound like "wow, if a program runs arbitrary code, then arbitrary code might run" which is kind of...tautological. But the article has other goodies, like "the security check to keep dangerous code out of the kernel...runs with user permissions", and "code signing only rejects an app if it has an untrusted signature, but lets it through if it has no signature".

Comment Re:Good (Score 1) 118

Hm. That actually was my problem with Angband. Too easy, too farmable. I'll have to give that a shot...though I suspect it's going to be a lot of long, boring running around in circles trying to get that ring of fire resistance before I hit whatever depth will kill me without it. And you thought stair scumming was boring...

Slashdot Top Deals

Real Programmers don't eat quiche. They eat Twinkies and Szechwan food.

Working...