Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Budgets (Score 2) 218

Okay, the only possible explanation is you are a troll.

Not usually, but I needed to see if it's even possible to dent my excellent karma. I'd like a fresh start in 2012.

With the exception of the United Kingdom and possibly Germany, Europe is in deep trouble. And that is by using many different metrics.

I happen to see it with different eyes. I see the UK as being in trouble next (after Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Spain and Italy) since they are the only country in the EU that plays on both sides.

Consider borrowing costs. The rate the United States pays to borrow just recently (yesterday) inched above 2% for the first time in a month. Romania (one of the better-off EU members) borrows money at 6% interest.

Romania either had visionaries for it's executive (and honestly, I can't see the sailor and his crew as visionaries), or it just made the right bet in 2009 by accident. That being said, it used it's loans mostly to increase the reserves of the central bank in order to increase confidence, as opposed to using them to stimulate the governmental spending in infrastructure projects or others. How they got that part mostly right is beyond me, but I guess good things happen to undeserving politicians.

As an aside, the current rate of return on investments is compelling me to make some decisions that are very good for the local economy: I am paying to do some work on my home. The market is still volatile, there is no action on the treasuries, and a jumbo certificate of deposit only pays 1%. Literally the best thing I can do with my money is pay a professional to perform some efficiency-related home improvements to improve the value of my home.

Investing in real estate is always a smart thing to do after the bubble bursts. It pays off to invest in construction when builders don't have enough projects to feed their employees. An apartment in Central Park in Bucharest that was €230.000 now goes for half that and with a second parking place. The old blocs of flats in Victoriei Square are moving from targeting small business offices to residential and there are a lot of examples like that.

The Euro is certainly at a crossroads, but I am not as enthusiastic as you are about it. Let me be clear that I am not going to dance in the street if it collapses: The Euro is so big that its collapse will be felt worldwide.

I wouldn't be so dramatic. Except for the Brits, all the other EU countries would loose too much if the Euro went bust. They are taking their time coming up with the fixes for two reasons:
1) not to put too much pressure on the population (given the social impact in Greece as an example).
2) This uncharted territory for the EU and especially uncharted territory for a currency that is not (yet) tied together by a fiscal and executive union. They want to take it slow to make sure that there are no unintended consequences.

If the Euro does however break up, make sure that all your banknotes have an X in the serial number. The Bundesbank will only exchange the ones with an X to Deutsche Mark.

My point about the EU not being in as much danger as the US comes from comparing the industry. Sure, they have Apple and Google, but it's hard to compare the other aspects of the industry:
a) Airbus kicks Boeing arse bigtime (1378 orders vs 778 orders)
b) The car industry can't even be compared (heck the small italian Fiat actually is buying Chrysler)
c) EU infrastructure is doing a lot better. Better and newer highways in most of the EU (except for the newly joined). The US hasn't touched it's highway infrastructure from the 50s. The EU has a better, much faster, ever-growing train infrastructure (you just can't compare the two). And fortunately, in the EU we still have public transport.
d) Furthermore, the value of the debt is not even the real problem. The problem is the prospects of the debt. The US debt is ever increasing while the EU is moving slowly to a 0 debt policy (thus decreasing it). In the end, this is the big difference. If you have a constant (GDP wise) rolling debt, it's still acceptable and it means that you're living within you means, but having a 43% budget deficit certainly doesn't put that into any good prospects.

Then again, I'm just an IT guy, what do I know?

Comment Re:Budgets (Score 0) 218

At least we're cleaning up our own problems back here. How are you guys doing with your debt? How's your deficit? For us (snotty Europeans) a 5% deficit is huge. For the former rebellious colonies 45% still seems to be acceptable. Don't worry, we'll be happy to hire your grandsons to do our laundry and lawns in half a century. Anyway, things here are still better than in the States for now. The future? Nobody can tell, but Wall St. keeps trying (and failing).

Joking aside, while the Euro is having it's puberty phase right now, it will most probably work quite well for a long time. There's a a simple reason: it's way cheaper to fix it than to ditch it.

Comment If you want bandwidth, do it yourself! (Score 1) 240

It's easy, if nobody else helps you with fiber make a neighborhood association and invest in your own last mile. You own it, operate it and can easily get a 1Gbps connection from a large carrier in most places for less than $5.000, now divide that to the 200 households and they each pay $25 for 5Mbps if they all use all the available bandwidth at once (CIR) or more likely 100+Mbps (synchronous) in normal home usage patterns. You can upgrade the bandwidth by renegotiating the contract every 1 year. The real cost of bandwidth at the carrier (excluding the circuit to your POP) is currently at $2-5/Mbps. In Romania the bulk price for guaranteed bandwidth is €2.5 for 100Mbps and lower for higher capacities. The real question when you do this is where do you get a service provider to give you IPTV. Internet is easy to solve, just like voice. ATT probably will refuse to come and provide IPTV over your own infrastructure in order to protect their monopoly. This would be a great business opportunity, to help communities build their own infrastructure and provide them with IPTV, Telephone and Internet at their POP with bulk pricing and letting them figure it out further.

Comment Not all Server OSs require sysadmin skills (Score 1) 554

You can always run Lion Server on a Mac Mini Server. It would also be a very fast NAS especially if you add a Thunderbolt disk array. Might not be the cheapest option, but it gives you your own disgustingly easy to configure web/wiki/email/calendar/vpn/dhcp/radius/file server (with push support for email/calendar). If you can also get a static IP address at home from your ISP you're all set. This last part might actually be the most difficult one in the States, but in other countries it's either free (upon request) or for 1-2 Euros.

Comment Re:Get DNSSEC hosted SSL-keys working (Score 3, Interesting) 243

As you pointed out, it's not a fault of TLS as a protocol. TLS is a decent protocol, but the trusted roots part is not the best approach. I really have much better trust in DNSSEC as an approach. I just wish there was a generic way of publishing all keys over DNS (instead of LDAP) for SSH, PGP, S/MIME, SSL and anything else.

Comment Re:Does it now? (Score 4, Interesting) 284

My Mid 2010 15" MBP (Core i7, 8GB, SSD) has no problems on Lion. My girlfriend's Late 2009 15" MBP (Core 2 Duo, 8GB, SSD) did occasionally lock after upgrading to Lion. What I've done to solve that was to disable HDD sleeping since it's pointless on SSDs anyway. I noticed that it happened only when the computer was idle for some time (at least enough for the screen to go blank) and when it did resume, I got a black screen with the rainbow spinning wheel.
The results are mixed, as can be expected with a brand new OS, but it's not a tragedy. You can always restore to the pre-upgrade backups that you should always make as a responsible admin.
All new OS versions have bugs, that's why we get the first 1-2 fixes quite soon after the release. Apple is already working on 10.7.2, as 10.7.1 is in QA by now.

Comment Re:No soot with modern diesels (Score 1) 349

Most modern diesels give clouds of smoke only when the particulate filter is regenerating in the absence of proper fuel additives. Diesel particulate filters burn the particles during regeneration. The burning temperature is 600 Centigrade, which is not easily attainable in a filter unless you have some sort of a fuel burner in the exhaust. If you use proper Euro 5 diesel fuel in your car, it already contains the proper catalysts and the burn temperature drops to 300-400 centigrade, which is something that you would see in the exhaust system. If you see a modern BMW, VW or Mercedes giving occasional black smoke clouds it means that the driver is going for the cheap diesel fuel instead of the one recommended by the manufacturer. Euro5 diesel fuel is supposed to be mandatory soon enough so we are getting rid of this problem.
Regarding the smell, I have some serious doubts. You either have an inhuman smell or you forgot to wash your hands while leaving the petrol station. Modern diesels don't smell! Ever!

Comment Re:I like my Turbo Diesel (Score 1) 349

I do remember reading somewhere in the manual of my car that depending on the temperature, if you don't have winter diesel fuel available, for a diesel engine you should add Kerosene. IIRC at -40 Centigrade it suggested that you should use 80% Kerosene and 20% diesel fuel. Here's the question: you can't get Winter Diesel at your local pump in winter? In Germany, Austria, France, Hungary and Romania I am quite sure that you can at all gas stations. Winter diesel has a lower oceanic number (48 instead of 52) however it doesn't loose freeze and it keeps it's viscosity down to -40 Centigrade. If it's less than -40 in Europe, it's a bad idea to get out of the house anyway.
Apple

Submission + - Entire Apple Stores being faked in China (yahoo.com)

Nominei writes: China, long known for producing counterfeit consumer gadgets, software and brand name clothing, has reached a new piracy milestone — fake Apple stores.
Microsoft

Submission + - IE9 Blocks 100% of Malware in New Browser Test (threatpost.com)

Trailrunner7 writes: In a test designed to analyze various Web browsers’ abilities to protect European users against socially engineered malware attacks, researchers at NSS Labs determined that Internet Explorer 8 and 9 were significantly more effective at curbing malicious downloads than were the other major browsers. In fact, IE 9 was able to block 100% of the malware the testers threw at it.

IE 8 and 9 did remarkably well, maintaining an average block rate of 90 percent and 92 percent respectively throughout the experiment. However, the 92 percent figure for IE 9 is somewhat misleading, because it was measured without enabling the Application Reputation feature which is enabled by default in IE 9. So in reality, with Application Reputation feature enabled, the browser blocked 100 percent of malicious downloads.

Comment Re:Godspeed Atlantis (Score 1) 275

Oh, you poor thing... One can only dream. I do applaud your child-like innocence. Who knows, sometimes south dreams might come true. Four of the hundreds of kids that 40 years ago dreamed to be astronauts, are now in orbit, so maybe, just maybe, your dream can come to life.
</sarcasm>
I'm sure that NASA would have decent funding if it wasn't for the Middle-East conflicts.

Slashdot Top Deals

Say "twenty-three-skiddoo" to logout.

Working...