Comment Re:"Celebrity"? (Score 1) 233
I thought it was a haiku
Comment Re:PC ability (Score 2) 163
and how do we know this is being done the most efficient way?
The code needs to be peer reviewed
Comment PC ability (Score 2) 163
How much of this is dependent on the pc?
Comment Re:settling dust - I'll wait a year (Score 1) 235
Homer: You're right, Marge. Just like the time I could have met Mr. T at the mall.
The entire day, I kept saying, 'I'll go a little later, I'll go a little later...' And when I got there, they told me he just left. And when I asked the mall guy if he'll ever come back again, he said he didn't know. Well, I'm never going to let something like that happen again!
sorry couldnt help myself
Submission + - Best language for good access to filesys controls?
rhade writes: After an exhaustive search of all file managers I could find readily available on the internets, I cannot find one that I am truly happy with, so what is left to do other than write my own.
But with all the options available to me, what do you think is the best language to write a cross platform (Win *nix OsX) file manager with the required fine grain control of numerous filesystems?
Submission + - Is a perfect object possible?
rhade writes: I know this isnt along the conditions of 'stuph that matters' i'm just curious what the community thinks.
A cube is described as a 6 sided 3 dimensional objects where all sides are the same(length) now this works well in paper, but could an object actually be created? You could make one with a degree of accuracy, metres to the closest centimetre, centimetre to the closes millimiter, and so on.
This would follow on all the way down to the atomic scale, could you make a cube that is x atoms by x atoms by x atoms? But even then as they move around the shape would not be static.
Your thoughts?
