Okay, firstly; your math is out - a far smaller number of people would have to walk into gas chambers on a daily basis to reduce our population to your arbitrary target well within 20 years. Currently significant population factors (birth rate and death rate) are compounded as a ratio (i.e. about 20 per 1,000) onto the existing population; any fixed-amount reduction that outweighs the initial difference in geometric components for population increase and decrease will become the dominant factor very quickly.
365 million out of (I'm assuming your starting number was 20 * 365.25m + 200m = ) 7.5 billion isn't much of a decrease in the first year (a little under 5%) but I'm sure you can see from here the compounding nature of the figure; once you're down to 500 million, another year would take over half your population.
Perhaps more egregiously, are you saying that a significant amount of our environmental impact as a species is our own poop?
How that place manages to stay in business in this crappy economy, selling massively overpriced poor-quality drinks, I have no idea.
I've suspected for a while now that people become accustomed to Starbucks and forget what coffee is supposed to taste like.
I,m sorry, I'm not anti-ms anti-apple pro-google pro-Linux etc.
We're anti-Google now - did you not get the memo?
Produce some copyrightable material (or commission some, if your company is the sort that claims everything you make)
Host it on HTTPS.
Access it from work.
... now they've circumvented your over-the-wire copy protection scheme.
A list is only as strong as its weakest link. -- Don Knuth