Of course! It's to complement the use of the possessive apostrophe.

Okay, firstly; your math is out - a far smaller number of people would have to walk into gas chambers on a daily basis to reduce our population to your arbitrary target well within 20 years. Currently significant population factors (birth rate and death rate) are compounded as a ratio (i.e. about 20 per 1,000) onto the existing population; any fixed-amount reduction that outweighs the initial difference in geometric components for population increase and decrease will become the dominant factor very quickly.
365 million out of (I'm assuming your starting number was 20 * 365.25m + 200m = ) 7.5 billion isn't much of a decrease in the first year (a little under 5%) but I'm sure you can see from here the compounding nature of the figure; once you're down to 500 million, another year would take over half your population.

Perhaps more egregiously, are you saying that a significant amount of our environmental impact as a species is our own poop?

I've suspected for a while now that people become accustomed to Starbucks and forget what coffee is supposed to taste like.

We're anti-Google now - did you not get the memo?

I once solved a similar problem with FLAC; seems to work great on most environmental data. YMMV.

Produce some copyrightable material (or commission some, if your company is the sort that claims everything you make)
Host it on HTTPS.
Access it from work.

... now they've circumvented your over-the-wire copy protection scheme.

Brilliant! We can use electric vehicles to reduce that pesky off-peak usage in the suburbs and increase peak load in urban areas!

Seems like a long way to go to avoid checking your luggage.

How much stuff do you need to use during a time frame measured in hours? Ever considered how much easier and more comfortable it would be to not have to sit around in all that crap?

10 PRINT "Problem #1... actually is hosted on DOS"
20 GOTO 10

You are not alone.

If I had to pay bottled water rates to drink water, I'd drink a lot less.

INT is knowing that a tomato is a fruit. WIS is knowing not to put it in a fruit salad.

Or print the key (ideally not passphrase-protected, or with a memorable password given to your executor) in ASCII and attach it to your lawyer's copy of your will. Use an OCR-friendly font, maybe throw in a copy on a USB drive. Once you've backed-up the private key and made sure it's accessible without your intervention, you won't need it so delete it. Save a list of up-to-date passwords (or perhaps your keychain and it's password; which could be more automated) encrypted with the public key somewhere easily accessible (web storage? Google Docs?)