Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:forensic 'science' (Score 1) 135

A bit too late to convict anyone at this point don't you say?

There are problems with many of the forensic methods used. However, eyewitness testimony is even less reliable. The way humans recall events from episodic memory is seriously flawed. Forensic evidence is always circumstantial evidence, and should always be treated as such. That's in addition to any flaws on a particular method.

As pointed out here, this man was suspected of being the ripper before there was any DNA evidence. DNA evidence just makes the case stronger.

Slashdot Top Deals

"May your future be limited only by your dreams." -- Christa McAuliffe

Working...