If the story is true, the principle committed wire fraud when they misrepresented themselves as the student to the newspaper. That's a felony. Like jail-time style!
There may be civil damages that can be attributed to that fraud, but I aint no lawyer.
Yes, the rant was publicly available on the myspace page, but it wasn't presented in the context of a "letter to the editor". The principle :
- 1) fraudulently represented themselves as the author
- 2) through that fraud, changed the context of the writing from "web page" to "letter to the editor"
- 3) this change of context had repercussions that damaged the student and their family.
Had the principle contacted the newspaper as the principle and asked that the students letter be publishes, what would the newspaper have done?
------ If it's a "legal code", how come it doesn't compile?