It seems to me they are more interested in whining about the problem than doing the hard work of finding a solution.

Finding a solution is easy. In fact, there are several of them. Getting everybody follow one is hard, and many don't see the need for any of them.

As I recall even thorium will only provide several centuries at 100%, though we could increase that by an order of magnitude by developing seawater extraction technology.

You don't get thorium from seawater; there isn't enough there. Uranium can be recovered from the ocean, and there is enough thorium on land to last nearly forever.

Yes, nickel is the most stable isotope, but hydrogen is not. There is quite a bit of energy released by combining a proton with any stable isotope of nickel.

I am not saying that Rossi isn't a fraud. He surely is. There are multiple problems with his demonstration, including the total lack of radiation, the conversion of almost all the nickel to nickel-62, the suspect calorimetry, the disappearance of one isotope of Be and the creation of another. But a lack of energy from combining nickel and hydrogen isn't one of them.

The Russian find is 300 or so metres down and thus it is easy oil.

In the Kara Sea? That is a much rougher place to work than in the Gulf of Mexico. I'm sure they will eventually manage, but I wouldn't call it easy.

Pretty smart. There were Italian scientists convicted of not warning about an earthquake.

I voted for Kang.

Really, he was on the ballot.

In their conference call Tesla stated their intention was to continue using cylindrical cells, but that the size would be increased by about 30%. Sorry, I didn't save the link.

The problem with wave farms is that they harness the gravitational power between Earth and the Moon.

No, that would be tidal power. The wave energy comes mostly from the wind. The main side effect that occurs to me would be less coastal erosion.

Nobody is using the size of cells that Tesla claims to be interested in producing. If they get cheap enough companies might design some products around them, but, for example, they will be too fat for a cell phone.

Of course Tesla might make other sizes, but I doubt they will be in any hurry to do that.

idiotism

Heh. I had no idea that was a real word when I wrote it.

No, it's an idiotism. But dictionaries are happy to reflect that usage nowadays.

Listing two obvious fallacies doesn't prove the initial statement is one, although at best it could only be true of sulfur based pollution. Of course, sulfur dioxide helps keep the planet cool anyhow, so maybe we shouldn't count it if it is released in the open ocean.

A 30 mile range? What kind junk are the buying?

A BYD electric bus has a nominal range of 155 miles. It sounds much more reasonable to me.

This is the New York Times.

No, it is the Los Angeles Times. There are many Times in the world, the summary should reflect that.