The Stanford Center for Internet and Society's Fair Use Project has filed a law suit against Stephen Joyce, who claims the right to control access to the papers and letters of James Joyce. . The New Yorker and Glyn Moody have written about the incident. a complaint for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief has been filed in the northern district of California.
It's mostly about book (Lucia Joyce: To Dance in the Wake) and related website ability to quote from Joyce's works to provide backdrop of critical and analytical commentary. A version of the book with about 30 pages of material cut out of it was published in 2003.
Some of may have to do with the history of one of James Joyce children whom was in psychiatric care.
The Joyce family has also removed writtings from the National Library of Ireland and has in otherways obscured or destroyed historical records. This sounds like a poster-child case for one reason why overly long copyrights are bad for society.

BBC : Amnesty accuses US over 'torture' reports that Amnesty International has just releashed their annual report. This report is very critical of the United States torturing and mistreating detainees.

During 2004, the human rights of ordinary men, women and children were disregarded or grossly abused in every corner of the globe. Economic interests, political hypocrisy and socially orchestrated discrimination continued to fan the flames of conflict around the world. The "war on terror" appeared more effective in eroding international human rights principles than in countering international "terrorism". The millions of women who suffered gender-based violence in the home, in the community or in war zones were largely ignored. The economic, social and cultural rights of marginalized communities were almost entirely neglected.

I just read a good journal entry about "Why Third Party Candidates Can't Get Elected" by tsg ... However one thing I disagree with is using Instant Runoff instead of one of the Condorcet voting methods.

Even though Arrow's Impossibility Theorem proves the impossibility of designing rules for social decision making that obey a number of 'reasonable' criteria that doesn't mean we can't evaluate voting methods according to various criteria.

When we do that we find that instant runoff has serious problems such that it is arguably no better than the USA's current plurality system at expanding the two-party system and giving other parties a chance to actually win elections.

Condorcet voting using the Cloneproof Schwartz Sequential Dropping (CSSD) method to resolve cyclic ambiguity is about the best all around method people have been able to come up with. Some weaknesses of the Condorcet method are that it doesn't always follow the Participation Criterion and it is still susceptible to some Strategic Nomination concerns. However in most situations it shouldn't cause a problem, and would be an incredible improvement over what we currently have.

Of course a good debate about Approval voting... maybe use one for the primary and another for the real election? They might be able to complement each other well.

Hey combining SCO news via groklaw and that 3d17.org thing I've made http://3d17.org/viewdocument/scoibm This has a third column for your responce...