I have a 9 year old Canon IP8500 on my desk for photo printing. Everyone is really impressed by the quality of the photos it produces, and I realised last year after replacing its worn-out printer head that it is getting pretty elderly.
The thing is, printers haven't really improved in the last 10 years. They now have ethernet and wireless/airprint as standard whereas my museum piece has USB only. But they a lot cheaper, a generally worse quality. If I had to replace my printer with something the same quality, I would have to get an A3 printer, which wouldn't fit on the available space on my desk.
The cost of consumables for my printer works out about the same as taking the photos to Snappy Snaps for printing, and the resulting quality is about the same, but I much prefer a trip to the paper drawer 4 meters away to a trip to Snappy Snaps in town during opening hours whenever I want to print photos.