Provided you don't get Carbon Monoxide poisoning from a faulty heating system for example. In England, I know that if there is a problem with that, I contact the local council's Environmental Health department, not the police, if there is a problem with that. I've no idea what the rules are in other countries were I go on holiday.

Because the sort of things you see on sale in Best Buy in the US are the sort of things you can only find in museums in the UK. Things like stove-top kettles and top-loading washing machines.

Two things, if the police catch an active criminal, it stops them from committing more crimes in the future. Secondly, people are less likely to commit crimes if they think there is a good chance they will be caught.

It does support adblock. Don't know about the other things as I hardly ever use it.

If the collect payments for the service using the Chinese banking system, then the Chinese government can use their normal legal channels to get the data they want.

The GPL guarantees that you have those freedoms, public domain does not.

Vodafone certainly did, and when I sent those recordings to the Telecommunication Ombudsman, they ruled in my favour.

Public domain gives you Freedom 0 (the right to run the software), and Freedom 2 (the right to copy and distribute it), but not Freedom 1 (the right to study how the software works) or Freedom 3 (the right to modify it).

Yes it would. RMS invented the GPL because of copyright issues, and before software patents became a problem.

Pointy Haired Boss - http://www.dilbert.com/

If you turn off some of the animation stuff that has been added in iOS 7, it is fine.

What I find with my iPad 2 is that some websites have a lot more Javascript than they used to, and the iPad 2 isn't really fast enough to cope with them. Previously, those websites would have used flash, which didn't work at all, but generally you could still use the website without the flash plugins.

Suppose I did a search for "ReekRend", and found an article that said you had been arrested for a suspected child porn offence. That might hypothetically be true, but what that article doesn't say, because it happened a bit later, is that the police dropped all charges after they found that someone else had stolen your credit card and used it to buy child porn. You probably wouldn't want the original article appearing every time someone searched for your name.

You could also use this directive to get the source removed, but only if the publisher is based in the EU or in another country that has similar laws.

You are entitled to get incorrect information removed. That is not new and not controversial, that is why it isn't considered newsworthy.