Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Shit like this annoys me (Score 1) 419

The issue is that 1) One of the largest retailers, Wal-Mart, will not sell an AO rated game. So even if MS, Sony and Nintendo allowed AO games to be licensed, you'd sell like 10 copies. 2) But on the other hand, they will sell unrated (ie, no ESRB involvement whatsoever) PC games. 3) You have to try REALLY REALLY hard to even get an AO rating from the ESRB. 4) So if you're making a game that you know for sure is going to be AO from the start, you might as well just make it for PC/Mac and sell it online anyway. However, I still do agree that a ratings system is kind of pointless when the "worst" rating isn't even usable.

Comment Re:This is why science rocks. (Score 1) 311

The rib thing is already wrong, because it insinuates that women can be created from men, when it's been proven that the natural default gender of a human is female, and you become male later.

The passage is mostly used to 'justify' that women are 'inferior' to men.

An accurate Bible would state that Adam was created from Eve's rib, since she would have all the genes needed. Adam would not have the genes to create Eve.

Comment Re:Either that (Score 1) 706

Then fix it by increasing the jail time for the actual crime of rape or immediately lock them up in the loony bin. Don't pull the unconstitutional bullshit of basically punishing someone AGAIN after serving their time. Having the registry just proves the fact that we don't even trust our jail system to rehabilitate people, but we'll never be able to fix it because someone that does is "soft on crime"

Comment Re:Guiltless pirate. (Score 1) 329

Just because the copyright expired doesn't mean you could no longer make money off selling the book to people that waited. You can continue selling your version of the book. Slap "Official Version" on it. You could make sequels to the book that would be newly copyrighted.

This is why I don't understand Disney sometimes. They can keep Mickey as a trademark, but they're spending $texas to protect Steamboat Willy. As far as I know, Steamboat Willy is probably a misplaced smudge somewhere in their accounting books.

They don't have to provide a clean copy of Steamboat Willy. People will be able to dissect, study, and show Steamboat Willy to future generations so that we can actually see the history of American animation evolve over time. They'll just have to get it out of existing sources.

They also have the ability to make NEW Mickey cartoons which will have full copyright protection! Cartoons that would bring in much more money than SW does.

I mean, it's not like our copyright laws are stopping China and Taiwan from making Disney knockoff merchandise. People know they are fake. If you are truly putting out the best version of your product, people will know that it's the "real" version. Instead of going after daycares that paint Mickey on their outside wall, you can make money selling your official stencils so that he's on-model. Instead of keeping Steamboat under key, how about you create and sell a curriculum centered around studying it for animation students that you can sell to colleges.

Oh wait, that would require actually getting up off your ass and making new material centered around your IP instead of just sitting on it.

Comment Re:why Opt-out? (Score 2, Interesting) 205

It's possible, it's just not a good use of money to just stick ads whereever.

Do you think they just stick billboards up next to a highway because they like to? Those ads you see on highway billboards were bought because the company that paid for them had data on the local population, like income level/political leaning/religion/language and so on.

If you can't tell a company who is coming to your site, they're less likely to buy ads if they do at all.

Definitely need some controls over tracking, though.

Slashdot Top Deals

"No matter where you go, there you are..." -- Buckaroo Banzai

Working...