There is still something that you apparently miss: Windows has vulnerabilities
There is still something that you apparently miss: Every Operating System since the dawn of time has vulnerabilities.
Humor me. Let's work backward in time, alright? Vista was released, in part, to correct or patch vulnerabilities in XP SP3. And, XP SP3 was released to patch vulnerabilities in XP SP2. XP SP2 was released to patch XP SP1. And so forth.
...and going back further Berkley patched vulnerabilities for the Morris worm. This is pointless.
Having stated that my fresh install of XP SP2 was infected immediately after connecting to the web, you declare that XP SP2 was a safe operating system, and that stuff like that isn't possible. Or, at least impossible for a "properly configured" system.
That's right. One of the things I listed was exposed, and that's how they cracked you.
Then, why does MS waste their time trying to make their OS more secure, if it is so secure that SP2 couldn't be compromised, out of the box?
Why does OpenBSD waste their time trying to make their OS more secure, if it is so secure that 4.4 couldn't be compromised, out of the box?
Really, you're not making any points here - this is foolish.
No, you're just so blinded by zealotry that you won't accept the fact that maybe you did something wrong.
I know what I did with that machine,
Did you follow NIST's or SAN's advice for machine configuration?
I know the firewall was turned on,
Did you look at the exceptions?
I know that I had an antivirus installed.
You said that it flagged the attacks. Did the antivirus installation disable the firewall in favor of using its own buggy implementation?
I also know that I felt secure in the knowledge that crackers and script kiddies don't waste time scanning lame-ass dial up networks.
All networks are hostile.
All the same, the machine was hijacked in front of my eyes. You may believe it, you may dismiss it, but you can't win an argument in which you accuse me of "changing something".
Okay, fine, you didn't change anything. Was ICS enabled? What was in the exception list? Was file sharing turned on? These are obvious things to check.
Fresh, out of the box installation, hijacked. You can google for more accounts of similar experiences - or not, as you choose.
All of which have one of the issues that I previously listed wrong with them.
The Windows Firewall when properly configured deflects inbound attacks just fine. Any successful attack is due to improperly configuring the machine.
But whatever, you're trolling, so were done here.