Maybe it's just a Monday, and I'm tired, but imagine getting a live feed of these things touring the caves, while listening to some real atmospheric ambient music. I'd post what I'm listening to now, it'd be perfect but I don't want it to be misinterpreted as some kind of plug. Music is one of the few things rarely linked here.

Not quite sure why you lost mod points here. For once we read about a judge doing the ethical thing, just very unfortunate that it is our loss. We can't win huh.

WOOHOOO!!!
I don't really care about the karma here, but there's been so much bad news lately this is rather refreshing.
I'll let the critics speak and explain why this is not as good as it sounds, but FTS it's inspiring.

I think the ruling was that clients are responsible for the losses.

As a disclaimer he did write "No kidding."

I hope they bring blankets!

Ah yes. I see exactly what you're talking about now.

There was that episode where Marge started hanging out with those "Real housewives" or something. Turns out they were just closet lesbians.

Shocking!

AskJeebes

I agree. Perhaps it was the lack of "direct" competition that let Best Buy relax so much that they didn't realize their business being swept out from under them.
Changing technology, online sales, along with poor customer service was surely ignored by the top levels of the organization.

It ends at him expressing beliefs not directly associated with, or contrary to the business paying him. I thought that was pretty clear? Take for example a pro-athlete, who is paid by a professional sports organization, and who has become rich and famous using the brand of that organization. They acquire millions of devoted followers (think twitter) who are almost obsessed with everything that athlete tweets, hundreds of times per week. Now let's say that athlete tweets something extremely offensive to thousands of people. Is that sports organization not supposed to punish the athlete for his/her comments? Should brands continue endorsing? Otherwise wouldn't it show that by continuing to support this athlete, it somehow aligns with the intentions of the company? Never mind if it wasn't published through an official medium such as a team press release. The association is implied.

FTFY.

I think $200 is a little much. I wish I could subscribe to MLB, NHL streaming for just my local teams for $50/month. NFL games are always broadcast on one of the basic network channels, those come in free. Sports are the main reason I keep paying for cable. $200 / year is ridiculous though because I would much rather go spend money at a bar and watch the game for free.

Some witness accounts, and IIRC the official police report state that Zimmerman actually headed back to his vehicle after being told not to follow, and was approached and attacked from behind. I wasn't there, didn't witness it, but this is of course why we have a judicial system at all. I hope you're never one of my jurors.