Profiting from another persons crime? the sites^H^H^H^H^Hgoogles primary income is copyrighted content, and don't pretend otherwise. they know full well without that pirated content they wouldn't have a business, hence they aren't innocent.
Here is how you can use google to find files of the mp3 and ogg kind. Who knows what license those files have? Should google have to know? Is it their job to police all web sites and remove copyrighted material or only their own, like youtube?
If piratebay is guilty then google is guilty therefore by the "logic" of ifpi:
if you use teh googleh you ares terrorerist!
You might say something like:
"Duh. The piratebay indexes mostly copyrighted stuff while google only indexes wholesome family entertainment. Also I am stupid."
So, if the piratebay had a bunch of legal material indexed like google then it's hunky dory? What should the ratio between those two be?
In fact the is a lot of legal material there.
In the end, almost all of this discussion is pointless because the real problem is that publishers and some authors still think that despite technology democratizing distribution of culture for everyone they still want to maintain their monopoly on it.
If we wish to live in a just society ruled by law and not by men then we have to be able to respect the law and feel that they are just for everyone.
"To make laws that man cannot and will not obey, servers to bring all law into contemt."
You can't respect the law if they don't respect you.
Fuck the cultural monopoly.