The whole of the nightmare in the middle east right now is the fault of the united states.
The British Mandate and the Balfour Declaration had far more influence upon the nationalities, peoples, and borders of the Middle East than did any influence of the United States.
Are they following the required procedures in each jurisdiction?
These laws seem both plentiful, varied and complex. I hope their coporate legal department wasn't planning on sleep for a few months.
If not, sorry, you can't drive this car.
"Unix is user friendly - it's just picky about it's friends."
Is this free to implement?
The state should not have the power to sentence an individual to death, but death should be available to those who would choose it.
Our government should not kill. A maximum sentence of life in prison is all the force that it should be able to employ against any individual.
If a person sentenced to life does not wish to continue the sentence, then they should have the option to request an end to it. After suitable mental evaluation, and assuming they are resolute, they should have what they seek.
This brings morality and transparency into the process. This is the right thing to do.
I deployed a DL380p Gen8 last year, and it gave me heart failure.
Under Red Hat, I needed to change the IP address, so I modified the file
Alas, the box did not come up on the new IP. Got to the console which was blank and unresponsive. Power cycled, and the RAID array was GONE (and let's just say this was EXTREMELY inconvenient timing).
Support was able to walk us through some BIOS disk recovery that (thankfully) worked. But I'll never change the IP address on a Proliant without a full reboot.
...but it seems to be a key player in Project Atomic.
This seems to be Red Hat's analog of Solaris "Zones" which let you give root to someone you don't trust in an isolated sandbox on your system. It appears to go further than zones in that you can exchange these sandbox images, with all of their installed software, with other systems. This lets you virtualize without running multiple kernels, yeilding a tremendous savings of memory. The additional assertion is that 3rd party software sales will be of these complete sandbox images, not an RPM/tarfile.
I will have a bit of studying to do for Red Hat 7. These are compelling new features, seemingly well worth the initial bugs.
p.s. just don't pass debug to grub.
...How about you crank out one of those custom patches to add a "systemd-" prefix to all of the systemd-specific kernel parameters, then bundle it into the SRPM?
Warmest regards... an Oracle Linux user.
Using Privacy Guard, I can see that Facebook has attempted to read my contact list 94 times. These attempts were blocked.
The "free software community" had quite a bit to say on gtk vs qt.
The design of KDE was based on a fundamental mistake: use of the Qt library, which at the time was non-free software. Despite the good intentions of the KDE developers, and despite the fact that the code of KDE itself was free software, KDE could never be part of a completely free operating system as long as it needed a non-free program to function.
Those are x86 parts. I'd prefer a low-power ARM, as long as I get W^X, rodata, and I otherwise do not have to compromise on security.
Perhaps the recent source release from Broadcom is sufficient to make OpenBSD support easier, but I fear that the developers' perspective is now set.
I would like to run OpenBSD on the Raspberry Pi.
I understand, sympathize, and accept your decision to avoid that platform, but what would you recommend as a stable substitute?
The BeagleBone Black seems like the endorsed alternative, although there were stability warnings until recently. The current status reads: "There are generally still a fair number of things to do on each of these boards, however OpenBSD is generally considered to be usuable on them. The platform is now self hosting, however there is no SMP support."
Would you point OpenBSD users interested in this hardware class at the BeagleBone Black? Any other advice? SLC media preference?
TI has announced that it is discontinuing the OMAP line. Will Beagle move to another ARM licensee, and does that matter much for OpenBSD?
I loaded Cyanogenmod 10.2 on my Nook last weekend, and there is now an option to "Encrypt Tablet" - supposedly it takes about a half hour, and it must be done on a full battery while connected to external power.
Will Cyanogenmod 10.2 do the same thing when running on a phone?
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it." - Bert Lantz
