"but I've already WON the debate"

You've called names and made silly accusations, you haven't even begun to debate.

"Sweden already DROPPED"

Has fuckall to do with any of my points.

"How much more evidence of a witch hunt do you need?"

I thought that from the beginning.

Had you spent more time learning to read, and less time learning to call names, you'd relaize my problem was with minimizing rape. THAT'S ALL.

The funny thing is you used the classic internet troll "I WIN" but you don't even understand what you're discussing, and your tirade just proved it.

DO YOU UNDERSTAND? I NEVER THOUGHT ASSANGE WAS GUILTY, AND HAVE ALWAYS THOUGHT THE CHARGES WERE THIN, YOU JUST DON'T HAVE THE INTELLECTUAL CAPACITY TO UNDERSTAND THAT APPARENTLY.

Of course you would, you call names when you lose debates, why wouldn't you be expected to be childish there too?

That's the truth, for example, in this post http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2945641&cid=40488907
you claim they never used the word rape, despite their being several examples of it in the legal briefs filed in UK courts.

Of course, you'll never admit you were caught lying, you don't have enough integrity for that.

You've called names and made silly accusations, you haven't even begun to debate.

Has fuckall to do with any of my points.

I thought that from the beginning.

Had you spent more time learning to read, and less time learning to call names, you'd relaize my problem was with minimizing rape. THAT'S ALL.

The funny thing is you used the classic internet troll "I WIN" but you don't even understand what you're discussing, and your tirade just proved it.

DO YOU UNDERSTAND? I NEVER THOUGHT ASSANGE WAS GUILTY, AND HAVE ALWAYS THOUGHT THE CHARGES WERE THIN, YOU JUST DON'T HAVE THE INTELLECTUAL CAPACITY TO UNDERSTAND THAT APPARENTLY.

So, now that it's been shown that you were lying when you claimed it "does not fit any reasonable definition of the word "rape"" you expect debate?

Perhaps if you hadn't openly lied as your initial tactic.

And as an aside, you provided a small explanation with those scare quotes, which was my suggestion, so thanks for proving my point.

Yes it is.

They filed a brief in the UK.

And is your point REALLY that Swedes don't speak English, so they don't use the word rape, so, it's not "rape by the legal definition of the country charging him"?

What the fuck?

No, there isn't.

Sweden disagrees.

So, do you do anything other than minimize rape allegations and call names to people you can't debate?

By the way, "That makes you scum. Period."

Awesome, name calling. First you support minimizing rape allegations, then you resort to name calling.

You're all class.

No, it's your use of the scare quotes around rape that minimizes a rape, regardless of whether you agree with the definition.

But you keep banging on me about the fact that I dislike the idea of playing semantic games with rape accusations.

And by the way, I think the whole thing is bullshit too. You seem to think that because I won't allow you and people like you to do shady underhanded shit with scare quotes that I want Assange in jail.

You're minimizing a rape allegation.

That makes you scum. Period.

Except there isn't.

So, now that you've been shown you were wrong in your claim that " it's not rape by any english language definition. " you're moving on to...what?

Some nonsensical assertion that, what, police don't have police powers? That only a victim can insist charges be pursued?

What's your point? I bet it's that you think the US government insisted he be prosecuted, isn't it? But you're too cowardly to say it, so you insinuate it.

Which suddenly makes your desire to defend the scare quotes make a lot of sense.

More bullshit, the quotes provide no context or explanation for their presence.

If any of you ACTUALLY CARED about clearing up the confusion about definitions, you'd be avoiding those quotes like the plague and, instead, explaining the law in Sweden.

The quotes do nothing to clarify anything.

Half that list is exaggeration or outright fabrication and the rest is a list of things that were occurring without Al Qaeda.

Next you'll be blaming childhood obesity and the Cold War on OBL and Al Qaeda.

And the scare quotes help clear up that inconsistency how?

They don't. Because they weren't meant to.

Then you explain the inconsistency, you don't put scare quotes on it.