Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Well, I'm glad you're back. (Score 1) 7

Thanks. I'm still alive and kicking, and in some ways better than ever. Even the woman at the customer service counter at my bank says I'm happier looking than she's ever seen me. I've learned a lot in the last couple of years. For example, embracing being outed in my own community last year, rather than running from it. The response was overwhelmingly positive, and as a side benefit I don't have to worry about what would happen if I were "outed" in any situation. It doesn't affect day-to-day interactions with the general public, since they can't tell (it's not like I walk around with a sign saying "I used to be a guy"). And since I expect anyone googling me to find out pretty quickly, this actually helps to filter out, for example, potential employers who are dickheads.

And, for those who can remember back to when I was outed on slashdot, it gave me the opportunity to help a few people.

So now it's time to help people understand a bit more about PTSD. Which means talking about murder and rape and stuff, because to be authentic, to be useful, I need to open up about the causative events, how I was unable to get help or fell through the cracks along the way, and other stuff.

Why not take the easy way out and just talk in general terms? That's wikipedia's job.

On a side note, filtering out ACs causes the site to load quicker :-)

Submission + - Do specs even matter anymore for the average smartphone user? (osnews.com)

ourlovecanlastforeve writes: While reviewing a recent comparison of the Nexus 5 and the iPhone 6, OSNews staffer Thom Holwerda raises some relevant points regarding the importance of specs on newer smartphones. He observes that the iPhone 6, which is brand new, and the Nexus 5 launch apps at about the same speed. Yes, they're completely different platforms and yes, it's true it's probably not even a legitimate comparison, but it does raise a point: Most people who use smartphones on a daily basis use them for pretty basic things such as checking email, casual web browsing, navigation and reminders. Those who use their phones to their maximum capacity for things like gaming are a staunch minority. Do smarphone specs even matter for the average smartphone user anymore? After everyone releases the biggest phone people can reasonably hold in their hand with a processor and GPU that can move images on the display as optimally as possible, how many other moons are there to shoot for?

Comment Re: More great insightful summaries from /. - not! (Score 1) 76

I've used the site longer and reserve the right to use Doctor Who references where I'm suspicious of technical details, especially as relate to timing vulnerabilities. This is allowed, as per The Hacker's Dictionary. Bonus points for finding the Doctor Who references included.

Comment Re: Cursory reading (Score 1) 76

That was pretty much my interpretation as well. Which would be great for ad-hoc encrypted tunnels - the source and destination can have keys that are valid only until the tunnel's authentication expires (typically hourly) and where the encryption is based on the identity the other side is known by. Ad-hoc tunnels need to generate keys quickly and efficiently, but also don't need to be super-secure. In fact, they can't be.

If RIBE isn't useful in ad-hoc, then you'd end up having to ask when it would be useful.

Anything that depends on a third party, including PGP/GPG with keyservers, is vulnerable to some form of compromise, SSL/TLS certificates all have a third party signer and Kerberos depends on all kinds of behind-the-scenes work being secure. However, although they're imperfect, they're considered adequate for what they do. Well, except for SSL, perhaps.

RIBE presumably therefore also has a niche where it's good. Rapid key turnover is what's wanted for conversation-based protocols with timeouts. That makes RIBE sound promissing for IPSec ad-hoc and SSL, as it makes store and crunch by attackers less likely to work. But is that the right niche?

Comment Re:Risk aversion (Score 1) 203

The problem is that Kickstarter allows projects that are very obviously doomed to failure and doesn't act when it is pointed out. They should protect naÃve investors.

There was one recently for an AA battery that can be recharged in 30 seconds. It's basically a capacitor and regulator. People pointed out that at the $20 price point he set for one he couldn't buy any available capacitor that meet his claim of 1100mAh. Worse, he would need to charge at over 150A to get the time down to 30 seconds.

He flapped around, eventually found some surplus 150A power supplies and intends to ship them with the batteries for $20. Some people will probably burn their houses down since he can't possibly afford a descent connector.

People pointed all this out and Kickstarter did nothing. Other projects defy the known laws of physics, or don't even make sense (did you see the "internet battery"?)

Even eBay tries harder to shut down scams and sellers who are clueless.

User Journal

Journal Journal: I'm dismayed at how many of the old gang are gone ... 7

I took another poster's advice and went through my two dormant accounts and friended a bunch of my old friends. But looking at the date many of them made their last post or last journal entry, it looks like many of them are gone, probably for good.

On another note, I simply don't have time to read, never mind respond to, AC posts any more. I know how disappointed that will make a certain individual (and everyone else will be going YAY!!!! FINALLY!!!! :-)

Comment Re:Playlists and MTP (Score 1) 74

Actually the Android implementation is rather good. Samsung tried to do their own thing which had some issues, but then switched to the stock driver and now all is well.

The system works well not just with computers but also with things like car head units and printers. You can plug in and print directly from your phone just like a camera. No special extra expensive iPrinter required.

I'll take it over the abomination that is iTunes any day.

Submission + - Amazon Wants to Crowd Source Your Next Kindle eBook (the-digital-reader.com)

Nate the greatest writes: Can a crowd of booklovers collectively pick a book which is worth reading? Amazon wants to find out. The retailer is about to launch a new program which will have indie authors submit their new unpublished work for readers to rate and discuss. The best books will be picked up by Amazon under a publishing contract with strangely limited terms: Amazon is asking for digital and audio rights, but not paper.

The program is so new that it doesn't even have a name, but it is already drawing the attention of some indie authors, including one that said she would be "all over it with a stand-alone just to generate more name exposure, which could lead to sales of my other books."

Submission + - Ask Slashdot: How do I treat my physician's PEBKAC?

An anonymous reader writes: Right now I have a serious, even potential life-threatening medical situation, but that's not my real problem. My real problem is that my lab results for a key indicator are in the reference range, and nothing I've tried in the past decade has ever worked to convince my doctor to prescribe a different dose when my indicator is in the reference range. [I haven't tried to explain why a 'reference range' is called a 'reference range', i.e. "Most people fitting your demographic profile would be expected to fall in the following range", and not a 'normal range', i.e. "This range is normative for you."]

I was treated for cancer a bit over a decade ago. During treatment I was told my thyroid would be irradiated and that could cause eventual thyroid failure, but that was "easily treatable." [The thyroid gland is tied to energy level, with hypothyroidism causing lack of energy (and hyperthyroidism, for different reasons), and when a diagnosis of depression is being considered, standard advice is "Get your thyroid checked even if it takes a bite out of your wallet."] I started feeling fatigue a year or two after and over roughly the decade since, there have been several times I've been positive my cancer had returned on grounds of fatigue alone. I have been experiencing a debilitating fatigue since then; I've usually been unemployed (other issues too, but it doesn't help if you interview for a position you really want, and are falling asleep in the interview despite being well-rested and having taken 1000mg of caffeine to be alert), and am presently on food stamps. Not necessarily that I'm the only person unemployed today, but since my thyroid started failing, I have gotten medical treatment which has consisted of thyroxine doses set based on blood levels for the indicator (TSH), and every single time I've been up for review on my dose, I've told my doctor that I've been severely fatigued and requested an increase in dose. The doses have increased as my thyroid has slowly failed, but I'm not aware of a doctor ever saying, "Your TSH levels in themselves don't indicate a change, but on clinical grounds I want to address your very real fatigue." Before treatment, I successfully earned advanced degrees at UIUC and Cambridge; after treatment I washed out of an advanced degree at Fordham. I've felt tired and hazy since I've began treatment about ten years ago.

Meanwhile, a week ago I committed the ultimate sin. I dug up an old prescription, began crudely cutting what are already small tablets, and tried an unauthorized increase in medication level, and the results have been dramatic. For the first time since I began treatment for my thyroid, I have felt like myself again. I've began projects, and tackled creative works. I've been able to focus on doing things instead of fighting a feeling of sleep. I've remembered pleasant memories from before treatment, memories I hadn't thought about in years. I've wanted things instead of simply reading to pass the time and hoping to die. (And I've started to think about how to communicate to a physician so that I can be myself again.)

For what it's worth, I had higher thyroid levels when I was young, and I believe I'm wired to function at some semblance of these levels. (I ate like a horse and was thin as a rail, and in the swimming pool I didn't float; I sunk at what I measured at a rate of two feet per second.) There's more that could be mentioned, but in a nutshell, I believe that I function best when my thyroid levels are what they were before they were being replaced, not what is necessarily typical of someone with my demographic profile.

There is a story about denial that mentioned a story of a young woman who approached a doctor about some symptoms and was told, "Good news! You have diabetes. With a few simple lifestyle choices, you can live a fairly normal life." She asked for a second opinion. The second doctor said, "Diabetes." She went from one doctor to another, and they kept on trying to tell her she had diabetes. Eventually, she died, and the medical examiner's report said, "Diabetes." The storyteller wrote, "It should have said, 'Denial.'" And I'm in something of a similar condition. I've made something like a decade's effort to get clinically appropriate treatment for what has been debilitating fatigue, and increasing my Levothyroxine dose very slightly makes worlds of difference, but my doctors haven't been willing to take that step because my lab results have been in the reference range and close to it, and so I get patient education when I try to say there has been a mistake with my doctor reducing my dosage. If I were to die, which came close to happening recently, the medical examiner's report shouldn't say, "Hypo-thyroidism;" it would be better to say, "TSH in reference range," or, better, "PEBKAC on part of physician."

Is there any effective way to ask for different treatment? Would it help if I asked permission to sign a waiver for dosing on clinical rather than TSH basis?

I would really like to pick up my life after this decade I have lost, and start living again instead of wasting away in my parent's house accomplishing nothing. How do I treat my physician's PEBKAC?

Submission + - USPTO says fraud by patent examiners will be met with 'disciplinary action' (washingtonpost.com)

McGruber writes: After Slashdot reported "Every Day Is Goof-Off-At-Work Day At the US Patent and Trademark Office" (http://news.slashdot.org/story/14/08/11/1519201/every-day-is-goof-off-at-work-day-at-the-us-patent-and-trademark-office), US Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) Deputy Director Michelle K. Lee left a morale-boosting voicemail to all USPTO employees. She told them "All of your efforts are critical to creating new jobs and growing businesses" and affirmed her support for a telework program she said made the agency a “sought-after place to work.”

Six weeks later --and umpteen media reports about patent examiners lying about their hours (http://yro.slashdot.org/story/14/09/13/2146240/us-patent-office-seeking-consultant-that-can-stamp-out-fraud-by-patent-examiners)-- Deputy Director Lee has done an about face. In an email sent to thousands of employees, Lee wrote “Simply put fraudulent time and attendance recording is unacceptable and must be met with appropriate disciplinary action." Her message then cited a number of steps the USPTO is taking to address the an internal USPTO investigation that determined patent examiners repeatedly lied about their hours and received bonuses for work they didn’t do. (www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2014/09/20/patent-official-says-fraudulent-time-is-unacceptable-and-will-be-met-with-disciplinary-action/)

Deputy Director Lee is the USPTO's defactor leader because the USPTO lacks a permanent director.

Slashdot Top Deals

I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.

Working...