Hertz: "We have no plans to use the cameras!"

Consumers: "Thank goodness! We were worried!"

Hertz: "Well, shit, it looks like we've got a plan!"

Frankly I think the procedure should simply be banned outright, with very long prison sentences for anyone performing a circumcision without a good solid medical reason. It's barbaric, no different than female circumcision which seems to be the cause célèbre of modern women's rights activists. And yes, I know circumcision can confer some health benefits (my understanding is it slightly reduces HIV transmission, as well as protecting against some kinds of infections), so does a woman having double mastectomies to prevent breast cancer, and yet I don't see a general move to lop off all women's breasts.

Keep in mind that there is virtually no evidence for panspermia.

Why would any rational person try bullshit non-therapies?

It's fucking bullshit. Jesus Christ, I can't believe the lengths people will go to justify witch doctor quackery.

If you've suffered a rehabilitating stroke or suffered some other catastrophic illness or injury that renders you incapable of doing the deed, it strikes me as completely unfair to deprive you of the ability to end your life. That's not even counting people who are suffering terminal illnesses.

Creating regulations is the way you eliminate, or at least make far less dangerous the slippery slope.

Maybe they're ultimately afraid they might be tempted to take that route when life becomes too unbearable.

You have a tough time being coherent, don't you?

Did you even read the fucking article?

Perhaps it is because there is no source of this chart. Who made it? Where does it come from?

Weather != Climate

Where did I say that? And who exactly is proposing totalitarianism? We're talking about limiting CO2 emissions here, not tattooing a fucking number on your arm.

Christ, we don't let people dump PCPs in rivers, do you think that's dictatorial?

Blah blah blah Koch-bot.