The difference is that their jokes are not attacking any minority group or ethnicity. Making penis jokes is infantile but it is a stretch to say that it is sexist. This is the difference. What's next ? I'll get offer ended at the colour RED so I will ask them to change their logo.

I feel like that it is borderline in this case, it is not a commercial product but an open source project, you may not agree but shouldn't they be able to run their own project how they want ?

Does this infringe some kind of law in the US ?

I use an Acer S7-392 for a light laptop for programming on the go if that helps. Got a refurbished model with a slight crack for cheap. I chose this because my previous MBP was not running Windows very efficiently, the hardware is quite optimised for MacOSX.

Just privatise water supply, we did this in the UK with trains and energy, now everybody is so happy and upbeat in the UK about the efficiency of our trains and energy bills.

When public transport is free or when people do not get fined for not paying you see more hooliganism from my experience of growing up in Paris. In the suburbs trains you see random young people hanging there going to random places to find targets to mug for money or phones. They also cut seats and pain graffitis.

Are you trolling ? This would not reduce traffic unless people share a car.

That's good for the car industry :) joking aside the rule is not permanent so there is no need.

It is a genius model: you outsource to Cap Gemini who outsources to cheaper labour from overseas who outsource to free labour from Stack Overflow who does it for brownie points.

It is a bit of a straw man: you only demonstrates that you can get caught cheating.

How dare you contradict someone implying that the NSA can force Asian manufacturers to let them weaken USB standards. I see you removed your tin foil hat, little man.

You are technically correct however it will never happen that the majority of people update a physical ROM. This would leave the vast majority of computers with vulnerabilities for years.

I don't understand your point: it does not invalidate his analogy