As a physicist blithely dismissing another scientific discipline, you're a lousy physicist.

Me neither. My sister played one. I always thought they were weapons of malleus destruction.

The only thing explicit is that RSA denied a bunch of highly specific scenarios. Let me highlight one word:

Now change that one word to from "known" to "unknown". Did they deny that?

Plausible deniability. The only truth with a hole in it!

Delighted to hear it. Let me know when you come up with a better theory.

... perhaps because for years deniers have been looking for observations that buck the trend.

Relax. Comments as idiotic as AC's make a dull thud, not a whoosh.

Hey AC: Want to hang out with like minded people giggling inanely until they wet themselves? http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/12/29/saving-the-antarctic-scientists-er-media-er-activists-er-tourists-trapped-by-sea-ice/#more-100034.

It seems that the "high efficiency incandescent" effort died in 2008. Why the brightest idea needs tinkering

True, but those were very small kids.

The law does not concern itself with trifles:

There was a young man named Rex
Who had diminutive organs of sex
When charged with exposure
He said with composure
De minimis non curat lex

Determining the size of the arresting officer's gonads is left as an exercise for the reader.

From TFA:

What a useless PR hack. Two points:

• A large amount of classified material is over-classified, not in the least bit harmful to national security, and mostly just embarrassing to the government.
• In circumstances such as this, it is actually government activity is that harmful to national security.

That was spot on about the carbon tax. But economics? Let me put it this way: Republicans don't care about the economy as much as they care about themselves.

You keep saying that as if it was an argument. It isn’t. It’s just contradiction.

Here, this Monty Python sketch may help.

With definitions like that, Merriam-Webster can literally do anything. Get lost, go jump, sod off ... anything.

... division of redundancies division, at 16:30 PM after afternoon tea.

Twaddle.
* It is not the N+2 rule is is the N-2 rule
* It is more of a guideline
* The guideline applies to grid systems. The German grid is not a system. It is just a part of the European system
* Heck of a job at Chernobyl
* Everyone in the old power industry SAYS renewable is bullshit. Everyone in the old power industry rambles on about baseload. Why? Because everyone in the old power industry is worried about their job.