Just waiting for the sandworms to show up first.
It would really be interesting to see where it would take us, but I worry about false positives in high-profile issues.
We know some things at least so far. California have over-used the water for a long time now, the ground water table is a lot lower than it was a century ago. The dam fill levels have varied up and down more and people have a tendency to look at them when it comes to how much water that can be consumed.
There have been periods of drought before through history - at which time major population movements were necessary. In some cases enough to end empires.
To me it seems to be used to explain the unexplainable, much like the aether of former times.
It's how the taxes are managed, not where the taxes comes from.
The budget system used by many states and countries is what leads to the waste of tax money.
The problem is that the devices reviewed aren't the devices that you have available in the shops. Specifications and designs changes so fast that you can't keep up.
I did read the quote in the article and couldn't make sense of their reasoning.
Maybe it helps to smoke something.
How much RFI will this cause on radio frequencies?
Considering the short time it was up I don't see a major problem.
The main problem I see is that encrypted links are certified as being more secure than unencrypted when it comes to privileges in browsers because they aren't.
The basic idea as I see it with the Firefox browser doing opportunistic encryption is sound. The problem comes with all permutations of how it can be applied in a way that's transparent for the user.
We also have the problem with the chain of trust - not all CAs are trustworthy.
I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.