My bad - I posted after reading the existing comments. and I guess I lost track of that important detail.
However, my piano is a digital Roland, hooked up to all sorts of MIDI stuff and to my computer, so it may still qualify.
I'd much rather it were a 1920's Steinway, but I have neither the space nor the budget for a really nice piano.
The NYT allows me 20 free articles a month, so your numbers are suspect.
However, that limit does not include articles linked from, for example, Google News or any Google search. Which makes it fairly easy to get around.
U.S. postal regulations explicitly state that if you receive unsolicited goods in the mail, they are yours to do with as you wish - you have no obligation to the sender. The liability is always with the sender. This is to discourage certain obvious scams.
If something is delivered to you which is clearly intended for someone else (i.e., right address, wrong name), things might get more complicated. I don't know the legalities in that case.
My sister was affected by this a few weeks ago, and I wondered that there was nothing on the news about it at the time.
She got a call saying that her account might have been compromised, and that a new card was on the way. Early on the day after she received the replacement card, and before she had even activated it, there was another call telling her that the new account number had already been used to make several purchases.
Clearly this was a serious breach that continued over at least several days, and was not the fault of a merchant, as they tried to claim.
"Conversion, fastidious Goddess, loves blood better than brick, and feasts most subtly on the human will." -- Virginia Woolf, "Mrs. Dalloway"