To argue that some silly law or court ruling overrides the First Amendment should be a criminal offense.
Replace "First" with "Second", and your statement is still perfectly valid.
Yes, yes it is.
Nobody except moronic, hyper-partisan fuckwads (on "both[1]" "sides[2]") ever argued that the First and Second Amendments were mutually-exclusive, you know!
([1] in actual reality (as opposed to the Bizarro-world perpetuated by the propagandists we call "mainstream media") there are more than two points-of-view on any given issue, and they are not all equally valid.)
([2] the only way to be on a "side" is to blindly worship the totality of a party's platform instead of forming your own ideology. If that describes you, go tear up your voter registration card and then kill yourself, for the good of humanity.)